SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-13, 08:02 AM   #46
Gargamel
Lucky Sailor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Aye, last thing you needed. At least it's open again now, but the backlog must be horrendous.
When you're done, unwind with this if you haven't already heard it:
As a sim pilot, I know just enough to appreciate this. I thoroughly enjoyed this, thank you.

What year was that done?
__________________
Luck is a residue of Design.


Gargamel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-13, 06:31 PM   #47
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,660
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Boeing has called for all 787 customers so far to immediately check all their Dreamliners delivered so far over the wrong wiring in the fire extinguisher system.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-13, 10:22 PM   #48
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gargamel View Post
As a sim pilot, I know just enough to appreciate this. I thoroughly enjoyed this, thank you.

What year was that done?
About 1981 I think.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-13, 02:36 AM   #49
mako88sb
XO
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 423
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
Boeing has called for all 787 customers so far to immediately check all their Dreamliners delivered so far over the wrong wiring in the fire extinguisher system.
Obviously this is a pretty ridiculous mistake to make and it seems inconceivable that a company with Boeings long history doesn't have the appropriate final inspection to have kept this from happening. Of course they do have something in place but what was different about the 787 that allowed such a error to occur? Or has something similar happened in the past?
mako88sb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-13, 05:28 AM   #50
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,660
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

The 787 is the mostr electrified jet ever. Classical, hydraulic, mechnaical systems have been repalced with e-system and e-motors to a much wider degree than in any other airliner in service today or in the near future.

They wennt too fast, too far ahead with that. And with a misdesigned electrical and especially battery system. The battery problems result from the hugely increased demand for electrical power aboard these airplanes. They needed much more batteries to be build in, and with higher capacity if possible. But the batteries they used, did not fulfill that demand. Plus their technology in itself is a more risky technology than other battery types (with lower capacity).

And so they are where they are.

You will never see me boarding any of these planes. I do not trust the design by its very philosophy and components chosen.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.