Hey look! the FBI and NSA are data-mining and analyzing your data!

All of them. It's not debating, it's name-calling. Either debate the topic properly and show where he's wrong, or discuss it like a gentleman.

Is it name calling or an accurate description of the situation.
The evidence relating to the arrest is a matter of public record.
You had no problem finding that tip-ex had been used to falsify the custody record. For someone to insist that no documentation was falsified shows that they do not know even the most basic information available, that person can only fit one of those perfectly normal everyday words.

First, calling him "bubbles". Part of your tactic seems to be to pervert peoples' names in a manner designed to insult.

Is it?

And yes, saying that everything he wrote is "irrelevant hot air" is an insult.

How?
Everything relates to a specific set of actions, anything not related to those actions is hot air (bluster, empty talk, gas.....) Which is by its nature irrelevant.
However one aspect of that bluster can be relevant if you stretch it, the persecution complex.
But if you follow that stretch to its logical conclusion it only condemns the officer for illegally falsifying the record while giving the reason why he felt he had to illegally cover up his legal actions.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Is it name calling or an accurate description of the situation.

It's name calling.

The evidence relating to the arrest is a matter of public record.
You had no problem finding that tip-ex had been used to falsify the custody record.

Correct, and if you had left it there we wouldn't be having this conversation.

For someone to insist that no documentation was falsified shows that they do not know even the most basic information available, that person can only fit one of those perfectly normal everyday words.

Maybe, but as soon as you point it out, especially the way you usually do, you change the subject from the case in question to the other person. That's where you go wrong.

Is it?

Since you only do it when you're busy putting somebody down, yes it obvious.

How?

Because it's not aimed at what he wrote, but at him personally.

Everything relates to a specific set of actions, anything not related to those actions is hot air (bluster, empty talk, gas.....) Which is by its nature irrelevant.

It's also not relevant to your argument. It's name-calling, pure and simple, and you've been warned against it many times now.

No more name-calling or insults. You've made a habit of it for far too long.