![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
You got me: I cheated. I just rang the German Ministry of Humor, Unpunctuality and Recreation to explain it to me. Its only employee told me "zis is no laughing matter!".
Thanks to you, now I have to go to the reeducation camp, this means biting into lemons all day - though i hope I won't become a limey. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Kaiser Bill's batman
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AN72
Posts: 13,203
Downloads: 76
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
At least you won't get scurvy.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Do not be so fast to discredit 5.56mm as a cartridge Skybird it is a very effective round.Your German hunters must be horrible shots because many American hunters use 5.56mm against boar and ours are much much larger and more aggressive.
It is all in how the round is applied under the correct circumstances it is very effective as a combat cartridge.The G36 has other design flaws not caused by the cartridge. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Soaring
|
![]()
I only quoted or base on reports based on Bundeswehr, police and hunter assessment. When the Bundeswehr says the G36 after 3 magazines shot empty sprays so much that hitting somethign with it, not mentioning: man-stop-power, becomes a serious concern, then I dare to conclude even as a niovice that there is a problem. Even under normal firing coinditions, wind seems to be of more a concern than should be the case for the infantries primnary AR. The bullet for the cartridge they say weighs only, if I recall correctly, 4gr or 5gr. A 7.62 has 8 gr, I think I recall. Well, wind and weight and velocity - there is an inevitable interrelation between these three, you just cannot sneak around the elemental rules of physics.
Note that the internal tests of the Bundeswehr warned of the weapon's poor performance from early on, the according office seems to have recommended to not buy it in that state. It is under examination why these warnings were ignored and never heard of again, corruption seems to have been the case. But the criterion that decides it for me is what gets reported by the German troops who field the weapon and ammo in Afghanistan. And they say its porked and has brought them very often now into critical situation, it seems, too little punch, too short legs, too little precision. With that kind of feedback, the decisive verdict has been delivered. The Wehrbeauftragte - and earlier last year I think the Generalinspekteur der Bundeswehr as well, but my memory may fail me there - said something like that he got "dozens and dozens" of complaints from Afghanistan. The ministry is up in arms against him now. Assuming he counted correctly, he just does his job - on behalf of the lives and physical wellbeing of the troops that were sent there.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Of course a larger bullet is going to have more power behind it that is obvious.That does not mean that a smaller round is just ineffective at all. The grain weight of the bullet can vary greatly a 5.56x45 round can be as light as 45gr or as heavy as 100gr a 7.62x51mm round can range from 147gr to 175gr. 7.62x51mm can have problems as well it can simply punch right though a target and do little damage requiring a shooter have very good aim and hit a vital organ for the round to pass though. If your ministry of defense blames all of the problems of the G36 on the bullet then they truly are inept.It would benefit H&K to claim the round itself is the problem rather than their weapon.The problems described are clearly a problem in barrel design and heat build up not the round.As I said though H&K would want people to blame the round not their crappy design. Both the US and British military have over come issues of stopping power by no longer using the SS109 round and going with a different design.The US Army been using up to 100gr 5.56mm rounds in some applications and gotten very good effect close to 7.62x51mm.Not to say that one round can cover all applications but problems with 5.56mm can and have been over come by less inept military bureaucracies. Again I question German hunters if they cant kill game that American and Canadian hunters drop all the time with 5.56mm. a Roe deer typically weighs 33-77lbs if you are unable to take one with a 5.56mm rifle you are a horrible horrible marksmen on top of that 7.62x51mm is too large for game that size you would destroy too much tissue. All of these boar where killed by 5.56mm rifles it is done very often in North America and our boars are larger. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Stealhead; 06-03-13 at 03:43 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Putting Germ back into Germany. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
For the bigger deer and the boars they are specified as double that power and the minimum bore is 6.5mm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|