UK faces court over migrant benefits

[tat501]

Dan D is right, you have to have employment, or the ability to support yourself or else you are not a "worker" and so not entitled to the freedom of movement of workers.

This is probably a short term (in the eyes of the EUSSR at least) measure which, when we all adopt the new full constitution that will come back in a few years time after the Eurozone crisis is sorted (by mass political integration and closer union no doubt rather than collapse no doubt!) when we will all be seen as one greater socialist state.

Welcome to the largest communist state on Earth we will be able to say in 2020...

Come on Atlas....just shrug already! We can do it if enough people wake up!

Dan D is right, you have to have employment, or the ability to support yourself or else you are not a "worker" and so not entitled to the freedom of movement of workers.

In case you missed a little teeny weeny itsy bitsy detail, it is being applied to workers too.
Now if you can explain how a worker isn't a "worker" you may have a point.

[bertieck476]

There are many thousands of "workers" in the uk who still require benefits of one kind or another and if they do have the right to reside then they are entitled to it.

There are many thousands of "workers" in the uk who still require benefits of one kind or another and if they do have the right to reside then they are entitled to it.

Thats the key, most of those benefits and tax allowances in question are claimed by people who are working.