Al Qaeda magazine applauds attacks in Boston and UK

[Red October1984]

Originally Posted by eddie

These scum deserve a hellfire in their laps!

They deserve more than that. Maybe one of those Thermobaric bombs. Sucking all the oxygen out of their cave sounds like a more fitting way.

On another note, I was reading American Sniper earlier and Chris Kyle tells of a time where they called in air support on an enemy sniper in a church tower. The jet came and dropped the bomb but it passed through the top of the tower and landed on the other side.

Upon closer inspection, they see that the bomb decapitated the sniper as it passed through the tower and landed in an alley full of enemy soldiers. He called it "The Best Sniper Shot I've Ever Seen."

'Merican Firepower! It works when it doesn't work!

Al Qaeda magazine applauds attacks in Boston and UK

In other news....the sun rose in the east this morning.

[Stealhead]

Originally Posted by Red October1984

They deserve more than that. Maybe one of those Thermobaric bombs. Sucking all the oxygen out of their cave sounds like a more fitting way.

There is a version of the Hellfire that has a thermobaric warhead it puts out around 5,000 psi of over pressure in its kill radius.Any large explosion sucks the air away from a location.What a thermobaric warhead does is produce a much larger and longer lasting blast wave.Most people within the kill radius will simply be torn into small bits in milliseconds long before they would be able to suffocate.And they do not all live in caves either actually not sure where this comes from perhaps Tora Bora where they had bunkers in the mountains.The leadership most certainly does not live in caves or bunkers.

Of course as Tribesman said why would anyone bother to read a magazine supposedly written by Al Qaeda which supports people doing Al Qaedaish things and get upset about it.

I mean really a terror group applauding a terrorist act allow me to display my shocked face...

[Ducimus]

I could care less what AQ says, because anything they do say, is kind of expected. No no.. what raises my eyebrows.....

Al Qaeda has a magazine?!

[STEED]

Originally Posted by Ducimus

I could care less what AQ says, because anything they do say, is kind of expected. No no.. what raises my eyebrows.....

Al Qaeda has a magazine?!

Penthouse ~ Middle East Edition.

[BrucePartington]

I am a tolerant and respectfull person by nature and conviction. But it implies I expect the same in return, no less. These people are getting encouraged by our "turning the other chick" through "political correctness" pushed forward by alienated politicians and bureaucrats. I fear that one day this whole thing will get out of hand, and it will all come down to a final show down of biblical proportions. "biblical" being the key word here. This dispute is milenia old.
Higher spirituality (loving thy neighbour) is corrupted by religion, any religion. Religion is created and used by mortals to manipulate the masses.
George Carlin nailed it right:

Edit: this one is good too. Enjoy:

[MH]

[Schroeder]

Originally Posted by Ducimus

I could care less what AQ says

*coughcouldn'tcough*

In before Steve.

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Stealhead

And they do not all live in caves either actually not sure where this comes from perhaps Tora Bora where they had bunkers in the mountains.The leadership most certainly does not live in caves or bunkers.

Of course as Tribesman said why would anyone bother to read a magazine supposedly written by Al Qaeda which supports people doing Al Qaedaish things and get upset about it.

I mean really a terror group applauding a terrorist act allow me to display my shocked face...

Agreed

[AVGWarhawk]

I support drones.

[Stealhead]

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

I support drones.

They are very useful.They do have one very major flaw in many cases you can not be 100% sure that have "sanitized" the target.Sure you can see the structure or vehicle blow up but people survive things the human body is surprisingly sturdy.When the target is in FATA(the tribal areas of Pakistan) or Yemen no person that is fully trust worthy can confirm beyond doubt that someone is dead as a door nail.

On the flip side of the coin supposedly they found some correspondence in Bin Laden's home that complained that the drone strikes where killing Al Qaeda operatives faster than they could be replaced.There also conflicting evidence as to the overall opinion in Pakistan about the strikes some studies claim that it encourages terrorism and others say that it does not.People do tend to forget that Pakistan someone can cheaply "buy" an angry group of protestors who of course are really there because someone paid them to be there looking upset.

[Wolferz]

Penthouse ~ Middle East Edition.

Does that have like pictures of naked goats and up habib shots?

[Red October1984]

Originally Posted by Wolferz

Does that have like pictures of naked goats and up habib shots?

I only read it for the bombmaking articles.

[eddie]

Originally Posted by Stealhead

Of course as Tribesman said why would anyone bother to read a magazine supposedly written by Al Qaeda which supports people doing Al Qaedaish things and get upset about it.

I mean really a terror group applauding a terrorist act allow me to display my shocked face...

Maybe if you had read the whole aritcle instead of acting like Tribesman Jr (who I ignore anyway) you might see it in a different way. AQ publishes this rag as a tool for for wannabe terrorists. Showing how to make bombs, how to attack anyone in the west as a lone wolf instead of a cell. Seems to be working, or did you miss the news about what happened in Boston and the UK!?!

"The first issue of al-Qaida's in-house magazine, Inspire, in 2010 called on recruits to avoid plotting with others, to strike near home and to use whatever weapons were at hand. In all three recent attacks — allegedly by young radical Muslims in the U.S., Britain and France — that advice seemed to be followed nearly to the letter "

http://news.msn.com/world/lone-wolf-...ligence-forces

So who would read it you say? Who the hell do you think would read it!
And my response to your answer-

Maybe if you had read the whole aritcle instead of acting like Tribesman Jr (who I ignore anyway) you might see it in a different way.

Maybe he looked and saw as I did that it is no different from all the other online crap they have been publishing since long before 9/11, Boston or Woolich.
The fact that this "news" appears to be a stunning revelation to you strongly suggests that you have had your eyes firmly closed for the past 25 years when they have been attacking your nation.

So who would read it you say? Who the hell do you think would read it!

Who would read it isn't what he said, who would be surprised at its content is what he said.