|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should one allow Sharon to die in dignity? | |||
| Yes, during next crisis, stop treating him. |
   
|
5 | 35.71% |
| Never give up. Alive is alive, no matter how. |
  
|
3 | 21.43% |
| They'll force him to live only due to his party campaigning |
  
|
1 | 7.14% |
| It's God-wanted that he suffers this slow death. |
  
|
2 | 14.29% |
| It's God-wanted that he will recover. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Dignity??? nonsens. Let's do it because doctors can do it. |
  
|
3 | 21.43% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-11-06, 02:28 PM
|
#5 |
|
Admiral
 Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
If Sharon's greatest legacy is his party, it's possible that he would put aside his well being and actually wish for his party to "benefit from a sympathy bonus".
I know that if Skybird's artificial survival helped in anyway defend Europe from the Islamic invasion, I would want Skybird to be kept in coma too, actually, I might aswell shoot him to "induce" the coma altogether. :rotfl:   (just in case someone missed it, this is a joke).
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode