Creationist Explains How Humans Could Have Hunted The Tyrannosaurus Rex

Well, now, one has to understand the nature of passion in order to recognize it's signature

Answer the question. You suggested a source, one person said they liked it without seeing it and a couple of others said they thought it was rubbish.
Reasons were given why the movie is simply crap.
So where are these passions you are claiming?

I think you are not interested in debate at all and were just chancing your arm thinking people hadn't seen the movie already and didn't know it for what it is.

However there is passion in this topic, its the sort which can take this....
I suspect the same technique would work with creationists.
And turn it miracuously into this......
So you don't have a problem with someone saying that anyone with a specific belief should be killed?

[WernherVonTrapp]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Answer the question. You suggested a source, one person said they liked it without seeing it and a couple of others said they thought it was rubbish.
Reasons were given why the movie is simply crap.
So where are these passions you are claiming?

I think you are not interested in debate at all and were just chancing your arm thinking people hadn't seen the movie already and didn't know it for what it is.

However there is passion in this topic, its the sort which can take this....
I suspect the same technique would work with creationists.
And turn it miracuously into this......
So you don't have a problem with someone saying that anyone with a specific belief should be killed?

I thought I already did answer it. And yes, my OP does clearly indicate that some people may not have seen it. You're also correct in assuming that I have no interest in debate. It was also clear, to me anyway, that my OP was merely a suggestion about a movie that I thought might raise some eyebrows. Forgive me, but I completely missed your point about "So you don't have a problem with someone saying that anyone with a specific belief should be killed?".

Originally Posted by WernherVonTrapp

I thought I already did answer it. .

Not at all, you just claimed it was there.

And yes, my OP does clearly indicate that some people may not have seen it.

The problem you had there was that some people had seen it.

You're also correct in assuming that I have no interest in debate.

So you enter a topic suggesting a source to support creationism but have no interest in debating the topic.
That makes sense.

It was also clear, to me anyway, that my OP was merely a suggestion about a movie that I thought might raise some eyebrows.

It raised some eyebrows, as in one "woohoo trash dawkins" and several "are you for real with that rubbish?"

Forgive me, but I completely missed your point about "So you don't have a problem with someone saying that anyone with a specific belief should be killed?"

The point was that it as example of a passionate response, examples of which you have failed to show.

[WernherVonTrapp]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Not at all, you just claimed it was there.


The problem you had there was that some people had seen it.


So you enter a topic suggesting a source to support creationism but have no interest in debating the topic.
That makes sense.


It raised some eyebrows, as in one "woohoo trash dawkins" and several "are you for real with that rubbish?"


The point was that it as example of a passionate response, examples of which you have failed to show.

I don't have have the least bit of desire, or passion enough, to entertain your unusal obsession with me. You act as if you're trying to impress me, or perhaps others with your incessant quibbling. I have to be honest, I am not impressed by you.
And, no, it's not because of disagreement. It's the manner in which you conduct yourself.