SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-13, 01:42 PM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,818
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

"Mean-spirited."

I can sing a long song of that, having been the target of rethorical underhandedness more often than I could ever find tolerable. and I often learned that I get treated with quite some arrogance and verbal cheating, and being attacked in mean ways when I stick to something I say that others do not like. My patience learned to know limits then, yes, and I may chose to cut off a communication by a laconic picture or a sarcastic final comment. It seems I am expected in these situations to endlessly sit still and just take rethorical hits, getting misquoted out of context or have words turned in my mouth or even have words pout in my mouth that I never said nor whose meaning I ever indicated. All this happened so often, and some people really expected me, and still do so, to just swallow it and not to move. But beware Zeus when I dare to react and give the change in the currency others have chosen first! Where I still see chances to have a communication, I try again with arguments, often being answered with complaints about pointless walls of text instead.

This must be a great surprise to you , Tchocky, but I fullheartly return the complaint you directed at me, and I could say the same that you said about me about quite some people here, usually always the same names, and that is the group of names that usually I no longer or only extremely rarely react to anymore, or even have on the ignore-list.

This is also the reason why with other people, who also may disagree with me, I find it easy to communicate, for they do not start to follow this path, and so I don't either. In principle, it is very easy to get along with me, the rule is just one: the stronger you push me, the stronger I push back. That's all. To some degree it seems one has to be loud and modestly aggressive in this forum if not wanting to get plowed under while saying something unpopular or somebody not liking you. I do not like to follow that path until the ugly end when it gets locked however, and also do not follow it that far anymore than I maybe did many years ago were it sometimes went on endlessly, so I tend to step out at some stage and leave the remaining people to themselves, then. They then sometimes say I would "avoid discussion". Well, let that little victory be there's, then - my ego can afford that .
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 03-17-13 at 02:01 PM.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 01:50 PM   #2
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
"Mean-spirited."

I can sing a long song of that, having been the target of rethorical underhandedness more often than I could ever finbd tolerable. and I often learned that I get treated with quite some arrogance and being attacked in mean ways when I stick to something I say that others do not like. My patience then knows limits, yes. where I still see chances to have a communication, I I try again with arguments, often being answered with complaints about pointless walls of text instead.

This must be a great surprise to you , Tchocky, but I fullheartly return the complaint you directed at me, and I could say the same that you said about me about quite some people here, usually always the same names, and that is the group of names that usually I no longer or only extremely rarely react to anymore, or even have on the ignore-list.
And so it comes down to what so many have said of you; that you are interested in dictating your peception of the truth, not discussion. Again, I suggest that a blog would be more appropriate for your tastes.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 01:55 PM   #3
Hottentot
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My private socialist utopia of Finland
Posts: 1,918
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
And so it comes down to what so many have said of you; that you are interested in dictating your peception of the truth, not discussion. Again, I suggest that a blog would be more appropriate for your tastes.
On the plus side, it does offer great hilarity when he paraphrases the Jehovah's Witnesses.
__________________
Хотели как лучше, а получилось как всегда.
Hottentot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 01:57 PM   #4
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hottentot View Post
On the plus side, it does offer great hilarity when he paraphrases the Jehovah's Witnesses.
Hmmm....



A new avatar perhaps?
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 02:05 PM   #5
Hottentot
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My private socialist utopia of Finland
Posts: 1,918
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0


Default

The style certainly fits and usually the resemblance becomes closer the more pages the thread accumulates.
__________________
Хотели как лучше, а получилось как всегда.
Hottentot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 02:19 PM   #6
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

I wonder how large a donation would be required for Neal to change it.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-13, 02:25 PM   #7
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
"Mean-spirited."

I can sing a long song of that, having been the target of rethorical underhandedness more often than I could ever finbd tolerable. and I often learned that I get treated with quite some arrogance and being attacked in mean ways when I stick to something I say that others do not like. My patience then knows limits, yes. where I still see chances to have a communication, I I try again with arguments, often being answered with complaints about pointless walls of text instead.

This must be a great surprise to you , Tchocky, but I fullheartly return the complaint you directed at me, and I could say the same that you said about me about quite some people here, usually always the same names, and that is the group of names that usually I no longer or only extremely rarely react to anymore, or even have on the ignore-list.


This is also the reason why with other people, who also may disagree with me, I find it easy to communicate, for they do not start to follow this path, and so I don't either. In principle, it is very easy to get along with me, the rule is just one: the stronger you push me, the stronger I push back. That's all. To some degree it seems one has to be loud and modestly aggressive in this forum if not wanting to get plowed under while saying something unpopular or somebody not liking you. I do not like to follow that path until the ugly end when it gets locked however, and also do not follow it that far anymore than I maybe did many years ago were it sometimes went on endlessly, so I tend to step out at some stage and leave the remaining people to themselves, then. They then sometimes say I would "avoid discussion". Well, let that little victory be there's, then - my ego can afford that .
I'm not talking about rhetorical underhandedness, whatever that may be. I'm not trying to twist your words or anything like that. I'm quoting Hoppe's words and saying that from a straight first reading of what's been posted, they are not worth serious attention - hence suggesting people should go off and buy the book in order to "graduate" to a higher level of discourse is irritating and without merit.

The other point I'm trying to get across is that you can't fairly complain about not being taken seriously when your own language precludes any disagreement whatsoever. Look at your first post in the thread.

It's kind of subsidiary to the main point - don't expect well-constructed rebuttal to poorly-constructed feudalist pipedreams. As presented here.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.