SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-25-13, 11:28 AM   #18
Glock30Eric
Ru$
 
Glock30Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 75
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat View Post
all very nice, but it has nothing to do with the F35.

current funding for the F35 program was U.S. $11.4 billion for the 2011 year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militar..._United_States

yes, a nice chunk of change, but cutting the program will have only a small impact on the deficit. In addition, the program is a one time cost, once the aircrafts are purchased, you are only talking about maintenance/repair.

The largest item in the budget is the war in Afghanistan, still U.S. $159.3 Billion in 2011.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financi...f_the_Iraq_War

Once the troops are home, that expense goes way down.

In addition, its not just a U.S. problem, many countries have to replace their aging fighter fleet. Canada will have to make a decision soon on replacing its CF-18s. Australia just paid AUS $2.9 billion for 24 F/A-18Fs, which works out to US $141 million per plane. Compared to that, the estimated US $150-175 million per plane for the CTOL F-35A looks like a bargain, especially since it will have a useful design life of at least 20 years longer than the F/A-18.

No matter how you look it, cutting new equipment spending is the least efficient way to balance a budget.
Well. I really don't think we need F-35. Our ships can take an enemy plane down easily with our long range missiles. Missiles are way cheaper than a plane with manned pilot.

Abolish F-35 and buy a massive amount of missiles like a ratio 10 missiles for every a fighter plane in the world. It will take care of it self. If they evaded one missile then they should be expecting nine more coming at them, furiously.

We need a long range bombers and really good CAS plane like A-10 to minimize the budget with very effective military force.

IMO, the fighter/bomber obsoleted the battleship in WW2. Right now a high tech missile obsoleted the planes and carriers. I don't think there will be a way to obsolete a submarine near in future, unless they send out a massive unmanned submarine/mine drones in the whole ocean part.

NAVAIR is developing unmanned air drone and it could downsize the carrier and planes.
__________________
Keep calm and carry on.
Glock30Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.