Waterstones IRA controversy

[ABBAFAN]

No. But is is well and truly binned.

Originally Posted by ABBAFAN

No. But is is well and truly binned.

So you didn't bun it when a convicted terrorist had a book there but you did bin it when one of your politicians who has not been convicted of terrorism has a book there.
So much for consistancy in your arguement against terrorists at Waterstones then.

[ABBAFAN]

Selling the book is one thing but these people had him in the store all smiley and bearded.

I was not aware Mandela had a book until I googled the title today and probably didn't have a Waterstones card then anyway. Not had it long.

Besides which Mandela was acting against a naughty regime. Ina nother continent and was not acting against the country Waterstones occupies.
Not at all like with like.

Selling the book is one thing but these people had him in the store all smiley and bearded.

What about if it was a picture of David Ervine?
He was one of your politicians too, but was also a convicted terrorist.
Given his role in the peace process is there any reason why you wouldn't be happy with a book on him getting advertised?
Apart from the fact that he was convicted he is really no different from Adams.

Besides which Mandela was acting against a naughty regime.

You know your country had to formally abandon its policy of torture after the years of abuse became public and they found that all these amazing confessions they got had put innocent people in jail for decades.
Was it naughty regimes you wanted to mention?

You just have to accept history ABBA its full of scummy people and scummy politicians and scummy governments, publishing and distributing books does not endorse these people, in fact failure to do so gives them an endorsement.
Don't forget that the ban on Adams words are one element in what made the muppet famous.

[ABBAFAN]

Interesting points. But I still fume at them having his picture up. As a patriot I would always be more strongly opposed to persons acting against this country than in obscure, far away places.

Interesting points. But I still fume at them having his picture up.

Understandable to an extent. After all like Tchocky says, the man is an idiot(without the ***** now)

As a patriot I would always be more strongly opposed to persons acting against this country than in obscure, far away places.

There lies another problem, Adams thinks he is a patriot, Ervine thought he was a patriot.