How games used to teach the player

Dowly · 10-19-12, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hottentot

*snip*

I was just talking about you with someone. I came to the conclusion that you need to
start another AAR. Like, right now. Just... drop what you're doing and get on it.

Hottentot · 10-19-12, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

I was just talking about you with someone. I came to the conclusion that you need to
start another AAR. Like, right now. Just... drop what you're doing and get on it.

It has been a while indeed since the CK2 project sank into the swamp without making even any noises. I have at least three games on my to-do list. And I think the first one is going to the dumb shooter just because of this thread.

Dowly · 10-19-12, 11:57 AM

This is going way off-topic, but didn you ever play Silent Storm? That might have
some AAR worthy material. Heck, it even has a Finn called Otto in it.

(That is, if you like AMAZING turn base strategy)

Ok, as for the topic.

I'm a bit mixed about tutorials. Some games do it well, like Chivalry (and M&B IIRC)
where you access a new arena via the main menu screen and you can try stuff
out, and Chivalry's tutorial is spiced with humor, it starts with a black screen
and a text saying: "3 years before the MP game". I can appreciate that, I'm not
forced to go through it.

Then there's games where the first mission is just hand holding, with text and
puzzles you complete by just doing what the text tells you, those I don't like.

Of course, it's all about how you like your games. Generally, I like strategy and sims,
so I am prepared for the fact that I need to read a lot of stuff to fully learn the
game. Like Black Shark, it took me quite a while (and help from Arclight) to
finally lock and fire my first Vikhr, but at the same time, it felt pretty damn
great.

As long as a game doesn't force me to go through a tutorial, I'm ok with that,
but please leave the option to learn by yourself in.

Hottentot · 10-19-12, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

This is going way off-topic, but didn you ever play Silent Storm? That might have
some AAR worthy material. Heck, it even has a Finn called Otto in it.

Sure I did. I never forget the Finn's (Olli if I recall, but could be wrong) voice actiong: the subtitles said "mahdoton" ("impossible" for the rest of the world) and the character blurted: "MÖHPÖPRÖÖH!"

Silent Storm just hasn't aged very well. I tried it again years later and couldn't stand it anymore. The cool factor had just worn off and I was more annoyed by the game's flaws. Of course flaws make great AAR material, but I make a point of not getting annoyed over writing those.

Dunno. Could try digging that up again at some point too, but my urge to write on military idiocy is currently better served by ArmA.

Dowly · 10-19-12, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hottentot

Sure I did. I never forget the Finn's (Olli if I recall, but could be wrong) voice actiong: the subtitles said "mahdoton" ("impossible" for the rest of the world) and the character blurted: "MÖHPÖPRÖÖH!"

Silent Storm just hasn't aged very well. I tried it again years later and couldn't stand it anymore. The cool factor had just worn off and I was more annoyed by the game's flaws. Of course flaws make great AAR material, but I make a point of not getting annoyed over writing those.

Dunno. Could try digging that up again at some point too, but my urge to write on military idiocy is currently better served by ArmA.

Oh right, yes, Olli he was.

Haven't played it in few years, tho always liked it.. until the battlesuits appeared.

But, go with what you are most comfortable with, really enjoy reading your stuff.

10-19-12, 02:51 PM

Silent Storm's combat engine is amazing I just wish that the Campaigns it was attached to weren't such utter wank.

Something along the lines of X-com or jagged alliance would of been so awesome with the Silent Storm Engine. (Hell Silent Storm had Alien weapons!)

Takeda Shingen · 10-19-12, 12:09 PM

A lot of this was also because of the natural intuitiveness of the older games. Megaman, for example, followed the standard NES forumla of press A to jump, press B to shoot, throw, etc. More often than not, modern games don't follow a standard formula; choosing to promote their own control system. It isn't just poor games or annoying systems that do this either. Look at the differences between Arkham Asylum's counter-based system and Fallout 3's VATS. Sometimes a little tutorial goes a long way.

HunterICX · 10-20-12, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hottentot

It has been a while indeed since the CK2 project sank into the swamp without making even any noises.

It's a shame perhaps we should burn Raptor1 and the rest of the lot on the stakes for witchcraft and heresy! Ofcourse after that fresh oil on the racks has been put to good use.

I'll just bump that thread and ask them flat out if they wish to continue or not.

HunterICX

10-19-12, 11:57 AM	#3
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,054 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	This is going way off-topic, but didn you ever play Silent Storm? That might have some AAR worthy material. Heck, it even has a Finn called Otto in it. (That is, if you like AMAZING turn base strategy) Ok, as for the topic. I'm a bit mixed about tutorials. Some games do it well, like Chivalry (and M&B IIRC) where you access a new arena via the main menu screen and you can try stuff out, and Chivalry's tutorial is spiced with humor, it starts with a black screen and a text saying: "3 years before the MP game". I can appreciate that, I'm not forced to go through it. Then there's games where the first mission is just hand holding, with text and puzzles you complete by just doing what the text tells you, those I don't like. Of course, it's all about how you like your games. Generally, I like strategy and sims, so I am prepared for the fact that I need to read a lot of stuff to fully learn the game. Like Black Shark, it took me quite a while (and help from Arclight) to finally lock and fire my first Vikhr, but at the same time, it felt pretty damn great. As long as a game doesn't force me to go through a tutorial, I'm ok with that, but please leave the option to learn by yourself in.

10-19-12, 02:51 PM	#6
Rilder Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	Silent Storm's combat engine is amazing I just wish that the Campaigns it was attached to weren't such utter wank. Something along the lines of X-com or jagged alliance would of been so awesome with the Silent Storm Engine. (Hell Silent Storm had Alien weapons!)

10-19-12, 12:09 PM	#7
Takeda Shingen Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 8,643 Downloads: 19 Uploads: 0	A lot of this was also because of the natural intuitiveness of the older games. Megaman, for example, followed the standard NES forumla of press A to jump, press B to shoot, throw, etc. More often than not, modern games don't follow a standard formula; choosing to promote their own control system. It isn't just poor games or annoying systems that do this either. Look at the differences between Arkham Asylum's counter-based system and Fallout 3's VATS. Sometimes a little tutorial goes a long way.