SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-12, 06:24 PM   #1
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

They're doing the best they can but they are, at best, an unorganised rabble, although Assads military (although better armed) isn't much better. There's a video as part of a fail compilation which I can't link here, which I'm pretty sure is from Syria, of a BMP trying to crush a car in a narrow street, and then failing miserably and tipping over on its side.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 07:00 PM   #2
soopaman2
Der Alte
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 3,316
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

I am conflicted in "rooting" for anyone.

I just know somehow it will become "Americas fault", no matter what happens.

Like Libya, and Egypt...

They deserve freedom, but what band of jihadists will replace Assad?
__________________
If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.

-Winston Churchill-

The most fascinating man in the world.
soopaman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 07:17 PM   #3
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by soopaman2 View Post
I am conflicted in "rooting" for anyone.

I just know somehow it will become Americas fault, no matter what happens.
It most likely will, that's the cost of being the pre-eminent global superpower, and having a number of key strategic partners and assets in the region.
You are damned if you do and damned if you don't.

Honestly what we're seeing here is the beginning of the 'Great Game Part Three', in the fact that Syria lies between two superpowers, the US (in Israel) and Russia, both have vested interests in the area, and both want a different side to win. A lot of it is down to resource gain as opposed to geographical gain as it was during the last Great Games, and some of it is down to maintaining the sway of a nation within a region in order to keep the current resources flowing.
Once again, the Great Game focuses on Eurasia which is, some claim, a geopolitical pivot point...certainly if one were to focus on how many wars have been fought in the area, one can see its importance.
Unfortunately for America, what this means is that it cannot cut itself out of this game and expect to maintain its position as a top superpower, you cannot back out of the Great Game and still expect victory, but at the same time...the Great Game doesn't usually end well.

It's telling, that the last Soviet-backed president of Afghanistan spent his final days translating Peter Hopkirks book 'The Great Game' into Pashto, hoping that: "They [Afghans] can see how our history has repeated itself...Only if we understand our history can we take steps to break the cycle" alas he was executed by the Taliban and the translation of the book has disappeared into the sands of time.

History repeats itself...oh so many times it repeats itself. There are so many similarities you can draw between now and the state of Eurasia in the 1800s...alas the tangled web of alliances made in the emergence of Germany as a major industrial power paved the way for the massacre that was the First World War. I just hope that we don't stroll down that road again.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.