New book by Navy SEAL contradicts official version of Bin Laden's death

Takeda Shingen · 08-30-12, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarJak

This SEAL obviously does.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question

TarJak · 08-30-12, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question

mapuc · 08-30-12, 04:05 AM

Whatever he have done, he HAD the right to a fair trail.(thereafter we eliminater him)

As a journalist wrote after his dead, now those 9/11 believes got new blood-why did they kill him, why didn't they captured him alive a.s.o

I guess, now that it have been "revealed" that he was unarmed, when he was killed, those truther got really good stuff to use in their debate.

I'm not 100 % truther but even I wunder why they had to kill him and not giving him the right to a fair trail.

Markus

Dowly · 08-30-12, 05:02 AM

For the truthers to use this in any way, they would have to get the basics of 9/11
right first, something they have failed to do for almost 11 years now.

Oberon · 08-30-12, 05:59 AM

Han shot first!

HunterICX · 08-30-12, 06:00 AM

^Here we go again!

HunterICX

Jimbuna · 08-30-12, 06:15 AM

In a country known to harbour armed terrorists, in a house where armed terrorists were believed to be, climbing stairs in pitch black conditions, hearing two gunshots, seeing a man peeking out of a door and suspecting it was possibly the worlds most wanted....

I'd say they had sufficient cause given all the circumstances.

Far better than the alternative scenario of a group of soldiers being gunned down or killed in a booby trapped house.

mapuc · 08-30-12, 11:40 AM

There are absolutly no weird or conspiracy about his death.

It's not more than an hour ago, that I heard following on the danish CNN(TV2News) that after he "was killed some of the other guys went into the bedrum and shot him several times at close range"

When they said that, I remembered how The romanian dictator was killed.

He got a trail-was sentence to death, but they how was ordered to do the job, couldn't wait, due to the deep hate towards the former dictator.

I think it's the same here -Hate, deep hate against a terrorist that have done some terrible things against USA and it's friends.

SO! There's nothing weird about his death.

BASTA

Markus

Bilge_Rat · 08-30-12, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc

Whatever he have done, he HAD the right to a fair trail.(thereafter we eliminater him)

As a journalist wrote after his dead, now those 9/11 believes got new blood-why did they kill him, why didn't they captured him alive a.s.o

I guess, now that it have been "revealed" that he was unarmed, when he was killed, those truther got really good stuff to use in their debate.

I'm not 100 % truther but even I wunder why they had to kill him and not giving him the right to a fair trail.

Markus

It think it was pretty obvious, even under the "official" version, that the SEAL's mission was to terminate him with extreme prejudice. There was never any intention of taking him alive and that is fine by me.

08-30-12, 06:00 AM	#6
HunterICX Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2006 Location: Malaga, España Posts: 10,750 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 0	^Here we go again! HunterICX __________________

08-30-12, 06:15 AM	#7
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,844 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	In a country known to harbour armed terrorists, in a house where armed terrorists were believed to be, climbing stairs in pitch black conditions, hearing two gunshots, seeing a man peeking out of a door and suspecting it was possibly the worlds most wanted.... I'd say they had sufficient cause given all the circumstances. Far better than the alternative scenario of a group of soldiers being gunned down or killed in a booby trapped house. __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

08-30-12, 04:05 AM	#3
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,553 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	Whatever he have done, he HAD the right to a fair trail.(thereafter we eliminater him) As a journalist wrote after his dead, now those 9/11 believes got new blood-why did they kill him, why didn't they captured him alive a.s.o I guess, now that it have been "revealed" that he was unarmed, when he was killed, those truther got really good stuff to use in their debate. I'm not 100 % truther but even I wunder why they had to kill him and not giving him the right to a fair trail. Markus

08-30-12, 05:02 AM	#4
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,055 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	For the truthers to use this in any way, they would have to get the basics of 9/11 right first, something they have failed to do for almost 11 years now.

08-30-12, 05:59 AM	#5
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	Han shot first!

08-30-12, 11:40 AM	#8
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,553 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	There are absolutly no weird or conspiracy about his death. It's not more than an hour ago, that I heard following on the danish CNN(TV2News) that after he "was killed some of the other guys went into the bedrum and shot him several times at close range" When they said that, I remembered how The romanian dictator was killed. He got a trail-was sentence to death, but they how was ordered to do the job, couldn't wait, due to the deep hate towards the former dictator. I think it's the same here -Hate, deep hate against a terrorist that have done some terrible things against USA and it's friends. SO! There's nothing weird about his death. BASTA Markus