Signature sizes and smooth sailing

[kranz]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

My interpretation has been that a general statement is permissible while a specific statement is not. By that I mean the following.

Not permissible:

Never vote Libertarian. They are destroying America.

In that aspect, your signature is fine. There are some, however, that need to reevaluate their sigs in that regard.

I vote for establishing a SubSim Signature Council TM that would decide which sigs are permissible and which are not.

Possible members of the Council: Skybird, Tribesman, Takeda (?)
Possible rules of proceeding: verdicts must be reached unanimously ()

I remember that Xabbarus gave me infractions once for some socio-economic sentence. The only problem was that it was uttered by Hitler.
I agree that any offensive, inappropriate, abusive sigs should be removed but c'mon...

[u crank]

Originally Posted by kranz

I vote for establishing a SubSim Signature Council TM that would decide which sigs are permissible and which are not.

Possible members of the Council: Skybird, Tribesman, Takeda (?)
Possible rules of proceeding: verdicts must be reached unanimously (

I'd pay a quarter to see that.

[nikimcbee]

Originally Posted by kranz

I vote for establishing a SubSim Signature Council TM that would decide which sigs are permissible and which are not.

Possible members of the Council: Skybird, Tribesman, Takeda (?)
Possible rules of proceeding: verdicts must be reached unanimously ()

I remember that Xabbarus gave me infractions once for some socio-economic sentence. The only problem was that it was uttered by Hitler.
I agree that any offensive, inappropriate, abusive sigs should be removed but c'mon...

Here's the process:

[Dowly]

Only the sigs that are waaaaaay over the size limit bother me.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by kranz

I vote for establishing a SubSim Signature Council TM that would decide which sigs are permissible and which are not.

Possible members of the Council: Skybird, Tribesman, Takeda (?)
Possible rules of proceeding: verdicts must be reached unanimously ()

I remember that Xabbarus gave me infractions once for some socio-economic sentence. The only problem was that it was uttered by Hitler.
I agree that any offensive, inappropriate, abusive sigs should be removed but c'mon...

I think you should be on the council. You seem to have all the answers.

FYI, number of signature infractions given by Takeda: Zero.

[kranz]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

I think you should be on the council. You seem to have all the answers.

Thank you. I'll do my best
(puts on Roland Freisler's hat)