![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Some of these new designs are starting to look fugly and IMHO this is yet a further example.
That 'strange thing on the bow' is the bow anchor. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() probably has a reason that they are designed like that. HunterICX
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Looks expensive.
Very.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 867
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I had an idea, which might be a good idea for an aircraft carrier. A submarine aircraft carrier. I know the last functional one was the I-400 class, but it's still worth a shot. Given the right design, it might even work nowadays. I am currently designing one for a fun project. Tomorrow I will put up some renders.
__________________________________________________ ______________ Edit:- Here's the renders
__________________
"Submariners are a bunch of intelligent misfits that somehow seem to get along, understand each other and work well together"- Anon Last edited by U570; 08-21-12 at 01:14 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SPACE!!!!
Posts: 10,142
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yes! you can design it, but can you afford it?
__________________
Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Not a chance, whole budget was blown on the design costs.
Welcome to the 3rd World UK.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Not a bad idea, especially with the new X-47 unmaned aircraft the US Navy is experimenting with right now or how about that new USAF 3,600 mph aircraft if say they could get that thing to work. What a combination ... I still remember the old Regulus missile program on surface ships and submarines that's how old I am.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Additionally, you could argue that all subs became "aircraft carriers" ever since SLCMs came around. A cruise missile is, essentially, a single-use precision bomber. I don't think operating a reusable aircraft in such confined quarters is actually more economical. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Stealth technology, lower radar signature etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|