For all your intrusive surveillance needs: FinFinisher

It usually makes me burst with laughter today when I hear somebody refering to laws, treaties and rules when wanting to make an argument in favour of any treaty

So that means sky can no longer argue against any treaty...or invent parts of a treaty he thinks exists in invisible ink so he can argue against it.
After all if it is naive to argue for what is written as it is meaningless then it is also naive to argue against the same thing as it is meaningless....and downright crazy to invent some writing when the writing even if somehow made real would be meaningless.
Is Mr self contradiction telling himself his arguements are laughable?