Netanyahu warns on Iran timetable

[Catfish]

What does the CIA say about all that ?
Weapons of mass destruction, this time in Iran ?
Now let us bet they won't find any, "afterwards" ?

WTF is up with you guys ? Become crazy and trigger happy by viewing media like CNN and Fox News, all owned by the biggest weapon companies like General Electrics ?
Netanjahu seems to want to blackmail the US because support is dwindling. The real threat for the US is Iran not selling their oil in Dollar currency.

a) Iraq has no nuclear weapons program, CIA just stated that a few days ago. And if it had, not really anymore because :
b) Israel (or the US?) have alrady bombed all kinds of military sites in Iraq in the last months in an undeclared war, pictures of the strikes with destroyed structures are everywhere.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Catfish

What does the CIA say about all that ?
Weapons of mass destruction, this time in Iran ?
Now let us bet they won't find any, "afterwards" ?

WTF is up with you guys ? Become crazy and trigger happy by viewing media like CNN and Fox News, all owned by the biggest weapon companies like General Electrics ?
Netanjahu seems to want to blackmail the US because support is dwindling. The real threat for the US is Iran not selling their oil in Dollar currency.

a) Iraq has no nuclear weapons program, CIA just stated that a few days ago. And if it had, not really anymore because :
b) Israel (or the US?) have alrady bombed all kinds of military sites in Iraq in the last months in an undeclared war, pictures of the strikes with destroyed structures are everywhere.

Again, just for you:

The CIA said that. The CIA that was told by Bush to produce eveidence against Saddam.The CIA that got burned in those exaggerated claims, and now tries to avoid getting burned again. The CIA that listens to what polticvally gets demanded by the president. Which is Obama. The same Obama who is campaigning and cannot need a new war right now. And who has glossed over islam several times in his speeches, and claims that diplomacy is a realistic option although so far it has acchieved NOTHING. His latest words over Iran and his own position on it, where a decvlaration of self-contradictions. If I were Netanjahu, that speech would have left me more nervous than secured.

At the same time when the CIA made these highly suspicious, opportunistically timed statements, the IAEA that just short time ago was extremely forgiving on Iran, has released statments of serious concerns over iran, saying that the indicatons that Iran is pushing not only a nuclear energy but a nuclear weapons program, are overwhelming. The IAEA. Nobody can say the IAEA is islamophobe or iranophobe, or anything like that. Under Al Baradei it actively assisted the Iranians in hiding their intentions, and denied any Iranian weapon ambitions, and supressed intel information indicating the opposite.

But when you start going, go all the way.

Iraq 92: after four days, the enemy all of a sudden was saved from further destruction. The result was a decade more of tensions, bloodshed, and another war, and the chaos resulting from it. One should have finished Saddam in 92, the door was wide open, chances were better than they were in 2003. Sympathies were with the Americans, too. There would have been no massacre against the Shia rebellion. One did not go all the way. Look what has come from it. Nothing but negative things.

what a maroon.
in '92 they didn't so the shia got slaughtered because Iran would have been strengthened if they hadn't....just like Iran got the bonus when young Bush did the very silly thing his father had avoided.
Now I could have sworn that Sky when he was still slightly rational realised all that and even made all those points himself very vocally and very repeatedly.