How Israel might strike at Iran

Jimbuna · 03-07-12, 07:32 AM

What a mess....trust none of them

Penguin · 03-07-12, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

What a mess....trust none of them

true dat!

The only reason why Hamas should care, is that some of them probably know that radioactive fallout from a nuke aimed at Tel Aviv doesn't stop at the PA's border.
On the other hand there are for sure also some who believe that Unca Mahmoud developes a bomb that only kills unbelievers...

Platapus · 03-07-12, 04:11 PM

We were having a discussion at work today about this: What if Israel attacks Iran and the UNGA invokes Resolution 377 and votes for sanctions and military action against Israel? I am not sure whether it takes a simple or a super majority of the GA to invoke 377.

Quote from the resolution

Quote:

Resolves that if the Security Council, because of lack of unanimity of the permanent members, fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security in any case where there appears to be a threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, the General Assembly shall consider the matter immediately with a view to making appropriate recommendations to Members for collective measures, including in the case of a breach of the peace or act of aggression the use of armed force when necessary, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

http://habitat.igc.org/ufp/a-r377e.htm

Skybird · 03-07-12, 04:43 PM

Forget that resolution. The heavy-weights in the SC will chose opportunistically whether or not they accept to bow the general assembly'S "pressure", or not. And last time I checked the US was one of the heavy-weights in the SC. France and Britain are something else, but the US will not let Israel face armed combat from UN troops.

It'S more likely that you will see a Klingon enjoying gummy bears than that the UN will ever play a constructive, competent and objective role in Israeli-Islamic conflicts.

Oberon · 03-07-12, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird

It'S more likely that you will see a Klingon enjoying gummy bears than that the UN will ever play a constructive, competent and objective role in the world.

Fixed that for you Sky.

TLAM Strike · 03-07-12, 08:31 PM

I'm sorry but this image had to be posted...

Qapla'

03-07-12, 07:32 AM	#1
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 191,014 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	What a mess....trust none of them __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

03-07-12, 04:43 PM	#4
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,719 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Forget that resolution. The heavy-weights in the SC will chose opportunistically whether or not they accept to bow the general assembly'S "pressure", or not. And last time I checked the US was one of the heavy-weights in the SC. France and Britain are something else, but the US will not let Israel face armed combat from UN troops. It'S more likely that you will see a Klingon enjoying gummy bears than that the UN will ever play a constructive, competent and objective role in Israeli-Islamic conflicts. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

03-07-12, 08:31 PM	#6
TLAM Strike Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Rochester, New York Posts: 8,633 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 6	I'm sorry but this image had to be posted... Qapla' __________________