SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-12, 01:43 PM   #1
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
That came as a surprise for me.

if the atombombs had exploded, it would not have resulted in a decidedly nuclear explosion, but more of a dirty bomb

Markus
Wouldnt have even been like that, the SS-N-23 is a tough missile unlike its liquid fueld cousins, they are heavy large and designed to deal with heat, the warheads are designed to take huge amounts of heat because they have to re enter the atmosphere so no real chance of a dock yard fire getting that hot in a consentrated area in that amount of time.

The reactors are very insulated as are all nuclear submarines of all the fires onboard nuclear submarines none have resulted in the discharge of radioactive material from warheads or reactors to my knowlege
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-12, 02:50 PM   #2
Lurchi
Planesman
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Posts: 181
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitan View Post
Wouldnt have even been like that, the SS-N-23 is a tough missile unlike its liquid fueld cousins ...
The respective missile family uses liquid fuel and they are certainly not tough. Rockets are lightly built because every bit of weight saved means more payload or fuel (=range).

I doubt if the warheads are designed to withstand a violent fuel explosion. On the other hand the K-219 incident seemingly did not result in a nuclear disaster which does not mean it cannot happen.
Lurchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-12, 02:58 PM   #3
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurchi View Post
The respective missile family uses liquid fuel and they are certainly not tough. Rockets are lightly built because every bit of weight saved means more payload or fuel (=range).



I doubt if the warheads are designed to withstand a violent fuel explosion. On the other hand the K-219 incident seemingly did not result in a nuclear disaster which does not mean it cannot happen.
its an unlikely outcome not totaly ruled out and yes they are liquid fueled the K219 warhead was never located but its believed intact, the problem with these missiles is the fuel doesnt react to well with sea water.
The R-29RM is a small missile compaired to its larger cousin the R-39 which is 83ton total wieght unlike the R-29RM which is 40ton which is roughly the same as trident.
R-39's have since been decomissioned as the only boats capible of carrying the missile have since all been decommissioned (typhoon class)

The russians seem to be moveing toward solid fueled missiles which makes them more stable.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.