We got scared

Takeda Shingen · 01-30-12, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randomizer

The attack on me as opposed to a critique of what I wrote is the typical response of a believer on the defensive. I had expected better.

And yet, you begin with this.

Quote:

Nonsensical Hyperbole, pure and unadulterated.

A sweeping, summary, and overtly hostile dismissal of an individual's statement leaves no room for discussion. There was no point in attempting to engage you. If you feel attacked, it is only because you threw the first punch. Look elsewhere for sympathy. You wll get none from me. Moving on.

CCIP · 01-30-12, 06:34 PM

I find it ironic that the person most dogmatic in this thread so far is dead-set on an unshakeable belief in the observability of atheism, and the all-encompassing reliability science

Takeda Shingen · 01-30-12, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCIP

I find it ironic that the person most dogmatic in this thread so far is dead-set on an unshakeable belief in the observability of atheism, and the all-encompassing reliability science

I found that amusing as well. Unfortunately, he has become almost a personification of what he decries about religion. The sad part is that he has a legitimate point, but his hostility makes establishing common ground difficult at best. Unfortunately, we see this style of argument far too often on these forums, but it usually is contained within the political threads. Still, this has the reputation of being a hot-headed topic as well.

Kudos to the rest of the membership for keeping the past five pages above board and clean in what could have been a very ugly thread. As moderators, we frequently deal in problems. It can give us a skewed view of the general temperment of the forum. This thread has, for the most part, reaffirmed my faith in the members of this board and for that I thank you all. You gave me a pick-me-up when I needed it.

01-30-12, 06:41 PM

One can discuss hyperbolic statements, doing so is generally fun since they back the speaker into a corner but there is no discussion where there is dogma and religion is all about the dogmatic.

Am disappointed that you cannot tell the difference between critiquing the argument and attacking the arguer. Had honestly expected something better. Go ahead and slam the door on the way out if it makes you feel good about yourself.

@CCIP
I assume that's aimed at me but if you would like to point out where I have been dogmatic, I would appreciate specifics rather than generalizations.

It is not dogma to demand proof and I make no claims at having all the answers.

01-30-12, 06:34 PM	#2
CCIP Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Waterloo, Canada Posts: 8,700 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 2	I find it ironic that the person most dogmatic in this thread so far is dead-set on an unshakeable belief in the observability of atheism, and the all-encompassing reliability science __________________ There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers. -Don Van Vliet (aka Captain Beefheart)

01-30-12, 06:41 PM	#4
Randomizer Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	One can discuss hyperbolic statements, doing so is generally fun since they back the speaker into a corner but there is no discussion where there is dogma and religion is all about the dogmatic. Am disappointed that you cannot tell the difference between critiquing the argument and attacking the arguer. Had honestly expected something better. Go ahead and slam the door on the way out if it makes you feel good about yourself. @CCIP I assume that's aimed at me but if you would like to point out where I have been dogmatic, I would appreciate specifics rather than generalizations. It is not dogma to demand proof and I make no claims at having all the answers.