![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
You're absolutely right there. I think they were built because the contemporary German armored cruisers were so dangerous as surface raiders.
Conway's says that the Invincibles were first concieved to carry sixteen 9.2" guns rather than the eight 12" guns they ended up with.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Yeah, though one shouldn't underestimate Jacky Fisher's role in the concept of the battlecruiser either. He had a big bright idea and he wasn't gonna let it go - it was the ship he really wanted to build (Dreadnought was his compromise that, ironically, proved to be the right idea in the end - but not what he really wanted to built). The battlecruiser was his ship and he was gonna see it through, and his increasingly outrageous designs in later WWI only show that.
Not that cruiser killers didn't have their niche, of course. The idea kind of survived into WWII, but never saw much use in reality. Then you could also argue that battleships as such were, in the end, also a failure. The predictions of Mahanian doctrine that they were built around never came true - the great decisive line battle never happened, while billions and billions were sunk into building the things by many nations, when the real masters of the sea turned out to be the humble airplane and submarine. And yet of course you can't not love the designs (assuming you like fast, powerful, intimidating, deadly-looking things) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 977
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Lexington actually had a good purpose it wouldn't fight battleships, instead it would be a scout for the main fleet and then return and help the main fleet destroy the enemy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
As scouts go, light cruisers were cheaper and in the end more effective. And both were not even close to a match to aircraft that, again, were already beginning to fill that role before Lexington even finished being designed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 977
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You should here what the British designed a cruiser with 2 18 inch gun but eggshell armor.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() And, like the Lexington, successfully converted to aircraft carriers. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 977
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
At least the Germans made their battlecruisers have actual "armor".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|