Another insulting and outrageous remark from an MSNBC reporter...

[Buddahaid]

Originally Posted by yubba

Well you took the time to type all of that out ain't it an inspiriting thing to read, but you took the quantum leap right over my last post, I'll ask it again what right does any man have to rule over or enslave another with out one's consent I didn't know a political party mattered.

You never explained how my stating I call myself neither Republican, or Democrat, is related to if I believe in the constitution and all men created equal in the eyes of our lord etc. You just repeated your question.

[yubba]

Ok, just call me stupid, I'll make it simple, so I and who ever reads this will know where you stand, and remember you asked for it no pressure, do you or don't you believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, and what it stands for.???? And of course you didn't answer my question, does any man have the right to rule or enslave another.???????also meaning, banks, governments,and other agencies with unfair practices.

[yubba]

I hate too say it your silence is deafening, no man has the right, too rule or enslave another, without ones consent. I don't care what krotch of what tree you think you fell out of, you don't have the right.

[CaptainHaplo]

Silence isnt necessarily deafening. People have lives outside of this forum. Just because you didn't get an answer in an hour means nothing.

[yubba]

You would almost think so, crap it's saturday nite, I should be pursue-ing my unaleinable rights, but I got into this debate, and guess what no one wants to anwser this question, Who has the right, too rule or enslave another without one's concent. Here's another who has the right to take from one and give to another.

[Sailor Steve]

I just got here. Obviously the answer is No One. My question is, when you ask a question like that you seem to be accusing someone of doing that. Who are you accusing, and why? Just because no one answers your question doesn't mean they don't have an answer. It could just be that you ask it for no apparent reason, which implies you have an ulterior motive but are waiting to spring it on someone if they actually reply.

So, if no one answers you can accuse them of being afraid to, but if someone does you can spring some cunning (to you anyway) trap. I'd say this comes under the category of playing games, which removes you from the arena of honest debate.

[Buddahaid]

Originally Posted by yubba

Ok, just call me stupid, I'll make it simple, so I and who ever reads this will know where you stand, and remember you asked for it no pressure, do you or don't you believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, and what it stands for.???? And of course you didn't answer my question, does any man have the right to rule or enslave another.???????also meaning, banks, governments,and other agencies with unfair practices.

I haven't answered your question because you failed to answer mine first as I indicated once already. You simply repeat your question to me about my belief and don't explain yourself.

Never mind, if you choose to orate on your own be my guest.

I stated I vote for who, or what, best supports my interpretation of the Constitution, and don't say it's not subject to interpretation as it gets interpreted constantly. As for who has a right to limit your freedom, we all do if in the act of exercising your freedom you impinge on others exercising their freedom. This is why we have laws and incarcerate people.

[yubba]

Well at least in some amount you do support the founding papers, to what extent is still to be seen, you say you'll vote for the person or persons that best interperts the Constitution the best, wrong you vote for people to repesent you, not to figure out, how to get around the constitution that is why we are in the mess we are in now, what is it, that you can't understand, seems to be pretty straight forward unless you are a communist, Marxist, or a Facist, it almost took 100 years for the liberals to figure out the 2nd amendment, what part of not to be infringed upon don't you understand, what part of freedom and liberty don't you understand.

[Buddahaid]

I stand for the Constitution enough to ask you what right you have to stand in judgement of what I believe in. The funny part is you have me pegged as on the far left.

What I want you to explain to me is how my describing myself only as a voter relates to if I stand for the Constitution or not, regardless if it is as our forefathers wrote it. That's the quantum leap I referred to.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by yubba

Well at least in some amount you do support the founding papers...

The founders themselves disagreed about what sections of the Constitution meant, and fought over it. The sooner you learn that your own opinion of the Constitution is just an interpretation, the better prepared you'll be for the real world.