Service officials could decommission carrier

Torplexed · 10-07-11, 08:51 PM

Instead of decommissioning the George Washington, let's give it to Britain. They could rename it Admiral Woodward, and send it down to Port Stanley. When it wasn't overawing the Argentinians it could be covered with turf and be used to raise sheep.

Jimbuna · 10-08-11, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torplexed

Instead of decommissioning the George Washington, let's give it to Britain. They could rename it Admiral Woodward, and send it down to Port Stanley. When it wasn't overawing the Argentinians it could be covered with turf and be used to raise sheep.

You've got a deal..................provided you pay for the turf and the sheep

TarJak · 10-08-11, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

You've got a deal..................provided you pay for the turf and the sheep

And the fuel to get it there. Oh... wait... never mind.

Jimbuna · 10-08-11, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarJak

And the fuel to get it there. Oh... wait... never mind.

LOL...should be plenty of that around those parts pretty soon

10-07-11, 08:51 PM	#1
Torplexed Let's Sink Sumptin' ! Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,823 Downloads: 43 Uploads: 0	Instead of decommissioning the George Washington, let's give it to Britain. They could rename it Admiral Woodward, and send it down to Port Stanley. When it wasn't overawing the Argentinians it could be covered with turf and be used to raise sheep. __________________ --Mobilis in Mobili--