![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
I don't know if this is reflected in the game or not. Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Now, alot farther from NYC.
Posts: 2,228
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Actually, the Japanese had every real intention of invading and occupying Midway. Attu and Kiska were also strategic initiatives and not diversions as was once believed. Yamamoto actually had his sights on Oahu.
__________________
"The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." -Miyamoto Musashi ------------------------------------------------------- "What is truth?" -Pontius Pilate ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
http://battlestations.eu/index.php/e...midway?start=1 Midway itself was secondary. That said, if they captured the island it could change everything. Just because we didn't have a full-fledged base there yet didn't mean they couldn't build one.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 50
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The book "Shattered Sword"put it clearly,even if the japanese had captured midway it would have required that every need would have to be shipped in.And since it did'nt have any natural resources all supply ships would have to return empty,quite a strain on an already overstreched merchant fleet.
By the way the above book is in my opinion a "must read"if you are interested in the midway campaign. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
An excellent point. On the other hand if he could have sunk all three of our carriers he would have had free reign at least for awhile. But then we would have sent a handful of subs to patrol the area around Midway, potentially sinking every supply ship he could have sent, which would have tied up destroyers as kaibokans didn't have the range to make the trip.
Either way it wouldn't have been easy for him, even if he had pulled it off.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Now, alot farther from NYC.
Posts: 2,228
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The IJN had no Higgins boats, no amphibious tractors and hadn't even conducted any practice landings or drills in preparation. They had no experience in such an amphibious landing against a well entrenched defense, as Midway was. Wake Island was not nearly as heavily entrenched/defended and we know how difficult that was for the Japanese. I could go on and on, even listing the numbers of troops, artillery and heavy weapons at each side's disposal, but my typing isn't currently up to the task right now.
__________________
"The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." -Miyamoto Musashi ------------------------------------------------------- "What is truth?" -Pontius Pilate ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Of the 'grand decisive engagement' doctrine -in other words, the intentions of Yamamoto - I am very aware. Also, of the historical meaning of this battle, as it was his intention to wipe out most of the american CV force, it not all of it, and eventually the opposite happened.
What I was left pondering is: did the japanese really care one bit about the island itself, other than being just a purpose for drawing in the american fleet? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|