SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-11, 10:48 AM   #1
sidslotm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default the Carriers' End


http://aviationweek.typepad.com/ares...nswers_yo.html

An interesting little article this one, the awesome battleship wiped out by the aircraft Carriers flight wing. But is the mighty carrier also approaching the end of it's eara. After all, look at all the Nations buying used submarines. One little sub can put an end to all this might, the USA had real problems finding Gotlands on naval war games recently, the last report I heard was that they could not detect Gotlands. I wonder if Cadaffi had a couple of used boats in the med if the French and British carriers would be flexing their muscle so openly.

just a thought
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 11:05 AM   #2
Herr-Berbunch
Kaiser Bill's batman
 
Herr-Berbunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AN72
Posts: 13,203
Downloads: 76
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidslotm View Post
I wonder if Cadaffi had a couple of used boats in the med if the French and British carriers would be flexing their muscle so openly.
The British only have one carrier, Illustrious, currently undergoing sea trials after a refit. HMS Ocean may sometimes be mistaken for a carrier but is an Amphibious Assault Vessel, or Landing Platform Helicopter to some Americans.


No surree, if Libya had subs we'd clearly have our Nimrods patrolling...

...Uh, what? Whaddya mean we don't have any Nimrods flying?
__________________
Herr-Berbunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 11:57 AM   #3
Osmium Steele
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Upper midwest USA
Posts: 1,101
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0


Default

The technology development regarding Detection v. Stealth runs apace. In my humble opinion, what will bring the era of the carrier to an end is this.
__________________
In the month of July of the year 1348, between the feasts of St. Benedict and of St. Swithin,
a strange thing came upon England...


My U297 build thread
Osmium Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 12:38 PM   #4
Gorduz
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 210
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

I believe the carriers will loose their importance together with the manned fighter jet. And eventually small ships carrying drones or advanced cruise missiles will be a viable and cost effective option for small navies and the big ones will follow. Though some carriers will probably remain in service for a long time due to their symbolic power.
__________________
21. MTB skv. Attacks without warning.
Gorduz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 02:35 PM   #5
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,552
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Undoubtedly carriers can project their might much further than anything but ICBM atm but they are starting to look increasingly vulnerable to underwater threats.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 04:07 PM   #6
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,552
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaddogK View Post
Carriers were doomed when they retired the shipboard ASW. A handfull of helo's, SOSUS and long range P-3 patrols won't cut it once a sub gets past the picket ships.
Can't disagree with that...there have been many instances posted on the internet where carriers and their escorts have failed to detect subs on joint exercises.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 05:31 PM   #7
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herr-Berbunch View Post
No surree, if Libya had subs we'd clearly have our Nimrods patrolling...
Don't worry, the last one was in bad shape last I heard (probably hadn't made a dive since Y2K), and she was most likely captured by the Rebels in Benghazi.

Last known location on the civie overheads was 32° 6'34.48"N 20° 3'10.39"E on 8/13/2010.

They might still have their R-2M SDVs but those can't do much damage.

Quote:
...Uh, what? Whaddya mean we don't have any Nimrods flying?
Oh you have plenty of Nimrods flying about, too bad they are all in Whitehall.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-11, 05:42 PM   #8
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Amen TLAM.

I wonder if at some point we'll have UCAVs which can be launched and retrieved from submarines. That would go a long way to making the carrier a thing of the past, however as it is, there is still a need for eyes on target attack plus anti-air capability which is only just within reach of current gen drones. When they've improved the anti-air ability of drones some more, then we'll be most of the way there I reckon.

Carriers would then be placed from the role of force projection into that of ASW escort work perhaps, after all they provide a good platform for refueling and rearming of ASW aircraft, be they manned or drone.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.