![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() Quote:
Besides, even if he were to loose power and somehow get it back it wouldn't be by permission of the international community whatever that is.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]() Quote:
There are states specifically African states which are not a signatory of the ICC agreement. The places now Gaddafi needs to weigh as to where he will be if he decides to step down. Insisting to hold on to power now holds little value to him. It's more like trying to get the best deal to get as much as the other perks with him. Now if ground pressure is mounting against him that would speed up his mind. It's much better to be alive and rich than dead or worse in jail for insisting to hold on to power. After all Gaddafi's situation is much better than say Iraq's Saddam Hussein. Here's why: Being a head of state or a diplomat requires international recognition and the person must command respect. A head of state or government who is on the arrest warrant of ICC has neither. He wouldn't be able to travel to conduct diplomatic visits or attend international(UN) or regional forums and even his envoys would not be as effective if not irrelevant to the eyes of the international community as they are representative of the person whom arrest is wanted by the ICC. Of course there's always the possibility of them shutting themselves from the rest of the world like North Korea but I think there's a strong reason why there is only a single North Korea like regime in the world and others do not envy their position. In one sentence a political leader who is on the ICC arrest warrant is an ineffective political figure. Dead politically. It spells the end of his political reign.
__________________
Last edited by Castout; 06-27-11 at 08:36 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() Nope. He has oil. Within a year other nations will be making back room deals if they aren't already. He only looses when and if he leaves Libya.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]() Quote:
Can't you see that the current Gaddafi is not the same Gaddafi before NATO decided to protect civilian lives in Libya. He has promised a vengeance to the west. So if he does make a comeback you can see Gaddafi's Libya sponsored terrorist blossoming. I got the feeling that the west doesn't want Gaddafi to fall under rebels effort. They hope that Gaddafi would step down instead. They gave Gaddafi time(being a friend to Europe has its perk I guess). The west has refused any effort to arm the pro democracy fighters as well. Because if they did Gaddafi would fall under the rebels effort. Sure NATO bombs Tripoli now and then and on the first two weeks did much to reduce Gaddafi military but they didn't help much with Misrata siege nor the west mountain fight. I assume because NATO commanders do not want to be perceived as being the rebels airforce. In the end they are making the impression they want a stalemate.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|