![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Egypt
Posts: 840
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I thought the ideal angle was 110°
__________________
x.com/lexatnews |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Reno Nevada USA
Posts: 1,860
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That 110° is to give the target the least options to evade your torpedoes.
That won't help much with the impact angle damaging the exploder. They don't need to evade if the torpedoes don't go off. ![]() ![]() ![]() I find that a 60 to 65° angle works pretty good. Magic
__________________
Reported lost 11 Feb. 1942 Signature by depthtok33l |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I myself never tamper with running depth and never miss it too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() The optimum track angle relates to having the greatest error tolerance in the targets course. It really has nothing to do with potential duds, target evasion possibilities, tactical factors, etc. It is not a comprehensive optimum angle, but gives the least deflection error for a given error in target course. The 110 deg. angle is not fixed, but only a "typical" optimum as it is a function of both torpedo speed and target speed. This was part of USN doctrine, and is shown here (plate XVII, XVIII): |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|