Calif. Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld

Platapus · 06-14-11, 07:44 PM

If a gay judge needs to recuse him or herself from a case that involves gay marriage, than heterosexual judges would need to recuse themselves from cases involving heterosexual marriage.

But, of course that does not make sense.

The sexuality of a judge should not have any effect on their ability to judge cases.

If a heterosexual judge can be presumed to be able to judge a case involving heterosexuals, why would not a homosexual judge be presumed to be able to judge a case involving homosexuals?

Buddahaid · 06-14-11, 09:10 PM

Don't confuse the issue with logic and sense.

frau kaleun · 06-14-11, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus

If a heterosexual judge can be presumed to be able to judge a case involving heterosexuals, why would not a homosexual judge be presumed to be able to judge a case involving homosexuals?

Because the gay ones have an AGENDA, duh.

Believe me, I know it exists. I've been trying to get "Take Frau Kaleun to the Tony Awards" added to it for years.

antikristuseke · 06-14-11, 10:05 PM

Is the gay agenda in any way similar to the evilutionist agenda?

Gerald · 06-15-11, 05:56 AM

"gay agenda" wow,it was something new

frau kaleun · 06-15-11, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

Is the gay agenda in any way similar to the evilutionist agenda?

Gerald · 06-15-11, 08:07 AM

False graphics, no doubt about it,

Betonov · 06-15-11, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendor

False graphics, no doubt about it,

Yep, too much green

Gerald · 06-15-11, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov

Yep, too much green

06-14-11, 07:44 PM	#1
Platapus Fleet Admiral Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,362 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 0	If a gay judge needs to recuse him or herself from a case that involves gay marriage, than heterosexual judges would need to recuse themselves from cases involving heterosexual marriage. But, of course that does not make sense. The sexuality of a judge should not have any effect on their ability to judge cases. If a heterosexual judge can be presumed to be able to judge a case involving heterosexuals, why would not a homosexual judge be presumed to be able to judge a case involving homosexuals? __________________ abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.

06-14-11, 09:10 PM	#2
Buddahaid Shark above Space Chicken Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 9,319 Downloads: 162 Uploads: 0	Don't confuse the issue with logic and sense. __________________ "However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light." Stanley Kubrick "Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming." David Bowie

06-15-11, 05:56 AM	#5
Gerald SUBSIM Newsman Join Date: May 2008 Location: Close to sea Posts: 24,254 Downloads: 553 Uploads: 0	"gay agenda" wow,it was something new __________________ Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie

06-15-11, 08:07 AM	#7
Gerald SUBSIM Newsman Join Date: May 2008 Location: Close to sea Posts: 24,254 Downloads: 553 Uploads: 0	False graphics, no doubt about it, __________________ Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie

06-14-11, 10:05 PM	#4
antikristuseke Silent Hunter Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Estland Posts: 4,330 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Is the gay agenda in any way similar to the evilutionist agenda?