Germany back than, vs Isreal now

[TLAM Strike]

Funny... didn't see any photos in the German colum of Jews with bomb vests blowing up buses or launching rockets in to civillian areas.

[August]

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike

Funny... didn't see any photos in the German colum of Jews with bomb vests blowing up buses or launching rockets in to civillian areas.

Me either, and a wall looks like any other wall but comparing one designed to keep inmates in with one designed to keep armed killers out is just wrong.

[JSLTIGER]

Originally Posted by August

Me either, and a wall looks like any other wall but comparing one designed to keep inmates in with one designed to keep armed killers out is just wrong.

Not to mention that these pictures are taken completely out of context. There's a major difference between prisoners held solely due their race and slowly starved to death, treated inhumanly, etc. and ones that are validly held because they have committed some sort of actual crime and are clothed, fed, and housed humanely. Any doubts about that? Look at the state of the prisoners. You don't see any Israeli prisoners that look like skeletons. Moreover, it looks like the third picture is actually a bunch of Muslim prisoners at prayer. Stark contrast to the Jews who were sat down before being murdered.

[Matador.es]

Its a pity, no comparison at all. Gutter "journalism".

One using force to overrule others

to be compared with

One using force to defand and not to be overruled by others.

This is todays remark of:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has warned against plots hatched by the United States to save Israel, urging world nations to remain vigilant.


---8220;The US seeks to save the Zionist regime (Israel) with deceit. Everybody should know that the survival of the Zionist regime and its existence even in one span of the Palestinian soil is like preserving a cancerous tumor in the body of regional nations, and [is] a permanent threat against them,---8221; said President Ahmadinejad in the Iranian city of Qom on Thursday.

He added that the Iranian people and world nations are awakened and demand justice, freedom and the complete elimination of Israel, IRNA reported.

The Iranian chief executive pointed to new plots of the US against the Palestinian people and its support for Israel and said, ---8220;Nations should choose officials who explicitly express their opposition to the presence of the US and Zionists in the region.---8221;

President Ahmadinejad warned regional countries against an escalation of the situation in the region, stressing, ---8220;They should be cautious not to jump out of the frying-pan into the fire.---8221;

Source: http://www.presstv.com/detail/181808.html

[jumpy]

Sorry for the following brutal editing; I'll be working on a reply for hours and hours otherwise
I'll try and keep to what I see as pertinent - for the most part my exploration of the images and what they represent was as full as I can make it from my understanding and vision. That might be lacking for some of you (or perhaps not) - I think I share much of what you guys have to say, in one way or another - this does not alleviate my deep consternation regarding much of what transpires in the ME.

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER

With all due respect, the vast majority of us were not decrying anti-semitism about this, merely that the comparison and portrayals being compared on this site are completely void of any semblance of context. Much of what is being shown are tricks of photography or taking images completely out of context.


EDIT

Now, I will readily admit that I am Jewish, and staunchly pro-Israel to boot. This is not to say that I think that the Israeli government is right 100% of the time. It's not. But I strongly disagree with any assertion that this is even a remotely fair or valid comparison.

It was not my intent to confuse the matter with the whole religious persecution thing. And I don't think you really take it as such.
I have to admit, I only viewed the link and discounted the rest of the site and it's other probable bias - putting my thoughts on the matter coherently was meandering enough already. Anyway, I stated in passing as such to mark the sometime response to issues like this one. Worth mentioning only for the sake of giving the OP some benefit of the doubt as to motivations in the discussion, and not particularly as a dig at any individual or anything like that; but it is a thing that seems sometimes so intimately connected with the subject of israel that it is often hard to avoid. The same can be said of the opposing palestinian viewpoint.

Both of which could fill more space than I'm prepared to accept right now.

Regarding the context; I tried to see the problem of how to define it - as it all depends on where you stand on the matter. I have no personal connection to it so is my objectivity better than yours? No. Just different. And that's the problem. The solution? Remove moral or regional bias (perhaps bias is to strong a word ). Taking the images at their face value, as alluded to in this thread already, would seem to be the most direct way to see through the diametric arguments.
In which case there is a strong similarity to the image comparison. Verisimilitude is a better word for it. And that's where I looked at the motivation to both interpretations (pro/anti israel/palestinian), either way of looking at it passes over the very real suffering shown in both, to the end that I found each to be misleading as a statement of an agenda. At least from my own perspective, such as it is.
The comparison is divisive from either end of the spectrum and therefore almost impossible to see on its own. I think this is the intent of the originator of the link; invidious it certainly is. But that was what I was trying to avoid.

As a direct response to you JSLTIGER, I see no reason why you should 'admit' to being jewish - I did find that an odd way to put it if I'm honest. I'm not criticising, it struck me more that you see it very differently, or with more weight than I. But there's no cause to 'admit' - the term for me carries some implication of guilt, where I certainly see none that is relevant here in this matter or anywhere else. I'm not sure I expressed that right or that I took it in the manner you intended.

Originally Posted by MH

Thank you very much for your opinion.
I agree to most what you said.
Violence is wrong killing is wrong its all wrong.
I'm all for live and let me live my life.
So now what?
Should i lite a joint and vote for my government to disband borders of my country.
Maybe should i turn my self into victim for your sympathy.
Stop blockade of Gaza dismantle checkpoint and pray for the best?
Join Middle East Union?

EDIT

I don't care much about settlements in west bank.
I dont care about Gaza.It has nice beaches though.

EDIT

That's why is hard to let go Palestinians on their own.
It may be an invitation to even bigger bloodshed in even greater continuation in delegitimizing Israel.
We must become "victims" to win sympathy if any?.

For me Israel is my country.
My family lives here and it really pisses me off that some philosophical smart asses think that have right to discuss my legitimacy of being here.

EDIT

We should return to be those poor helpless Jews?

I detect more than a little 'don't tread on me' in your opening sarcasm - you seem to expect an answer of some sort and yet you don't really ask a serious question?
I'll tell you that I have lived in the ME and so understand much of your view regarding the animosity and hostility of the arabs to the state of israel, more specifically jews. I didn't countenance it back then and I think you guess correctly that I still don't
It's my observation that most arabs don't understand it either, nor do some jews. It's just the way things are, like cats and dogs, if you'll forgive the analogy.

I think the trouble is as you say yourself - no-one cares about settlements or gaza and the fractious nature of what is going on there.
Both sides have a claim and a grievance, based on ancient religious texts that seemingly allows for very little common ground and what ground there is has little to offer in the way of compromise or egalitarian prospect.
Starving many ignorant people with a blockade and walls is a reaction to violence surely. But is it the right reaction? Israel holds the key to peace in the ME and as a state I guess it is no better or worse in its behaviour than my country's past and present actions. Bombing UN observers and using phosphorous shelling on heavily built up civilian areas is not a good thing; neither is telling people to leave if they don't want to be killed. That too, has many disturbing similarities with the past. The legitimisation of intent falls short of holding water with that one. Or to simplify: two wrongs don't make a right.

Does this mean I question your right to live there? No. I don't recall saying that. But it doesn't question theirs either, which I suspect is also part of the problem over there. If you dismiss another's interest in dialogue as philosophical chicanery, rendering it down to the statement that 'you think we don't belong here' that's a very sad thing to behold because it means you (I know this is what you said, but I'm speaking as a generalisation) no longer care for understanding what any one else thinks. Once again this is a real problem with both sides.

Asking if you should return to being those poor helpless jews, is a deeply loaded question. You know that pretty much any answer I give will most likely fail at communication. I think it is rhetorical and not absolute, so don't misunderstand if I dismiss it as such.

Reading back over this it seems I'm coming across as anti israeli perhaps.
I am not. I am anti violence though, because until that stops nothing will ever change. Accepting aggression or fighting back is a hard question, one I do not have to live with (not since school anyway hehe). So I don't pretend to have any answers for you there. It would be great if there was some panacea that would make everything groovy, but somebody has to start somewhere and to continue in the face of some of the most terrible adversity the world has to offer.
Again, I think we understand each other enough to cross words but not anything more serious and bear in mind I would have the same ideas to express to an arab, though he or she might hold similarly hard and unanswerable experience as yourself.
On the other hand, I get a sense of the same frustration and knowledge in the questions I ask as the response you made to begin with, if it is not overly presumptuous of me to infer.

If it didn't interest me I would not have the courtesy or the time to read and form a reply, though it may seem to you as a blind man grasping in the dark to understand the nature of what a shadow is when he has never seen light.
What seems commonplace over there looks very alien to me even though I have more exposure to some of it than most of my fellow countrymen. It is important you know I have a great fondness for the middle east with all its troubles and its incongruity. What might look to be criticism is a thought born out of a love of part of the region where I grew up - surely there has been enough hate and indifference by now? (so you see an idealism not yet killed off by solitude and pragmatism - I hope you do not think it too futile)

Originally Posted by Penguin

Yup, in this case I am one of those first shooters. It is a difference if someone posts a link from a newspaper article, or from a site made by imbeciles. And also in the case of the newspaper, I try to check the facts/sources.
As you stated, these images are pure propaganda, with a clear message and intention. There is no sitting on the fence, either you agree with the message, or not. If I post a hammer and sicle picture with the caption: "Stalin is the greatest leader" it is the same. Either I agree with it, or not. If I post it without further comment, it is fair to think that I stand behind this.

It would be another thing to post, e.g. a picture of an Israeli checkpoint with a crying Palestinian woman next to it in combination with an article that reports from one of these checkpoints. This could start a balanced discussion.

EDIT


I highlighted the important

EDIT

A victim of the war nonetheless!

EDIT


And this is where I disagree with you. The simularities are only in the eye of the viewer who looks only at the surface.


EDIT


Not quite. The word murder intends a purpose. If it would be the purpose of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians they could do it easily.


And that's why we try to discuss here: to help building up an own opinion. I try to do so, in this particular case I have have tried to build my own opinions, even changed them over the years. To me, arguments from one side made more sense and were less propaganda, this doesn't mean that I stick to pre-fap opinions at all costs.


EDIT


Sorry, would normally have quoted this for truth, however I had to cut it for readability sakes, this became a wall of text anyway....
I don't think this was too bleak, the original images were so, and thus your deep thoughts you presented in the last paragraphs make a good closing stement!

My first impression of the OP did not inspect the quality of a belief as you took it - sitting on the fence or posting it as a message of intent? More the images themselves and my reaction to them.
As I said above somewhere, I tried to look at the images without the preconceptions to begin with.

To me that there is a body to even discuss raises a serious point: a means to an end and the result is a victim of conflict that has no pity or forbearance to those simply caught up in its momentum, unable to decide for themselves the way of things as we do here.

I must admit to finding it difficult to assimilate the purpose and the intent and the result of certain israeli government and military actions, in much the same way I find suicide bombers and the mind behind concepts like martyrdom hard to contemplate, so my use of the word murder. Sadly the result is the same for someone who will not have a chance to live and grow. It hardly appears to give any feeling toward the dead (whoever they may be) to look purely in semantics. But there is a certain dispassion to be gained here I suppose, after all that's where I began with all of this!

It is something I appreciate here: even in GT there is a balance of words that is conducive to being able to post conjecture and rationale without derision, even though it may be that I still have the same questions without clearly apparent answers... oh well
But I have always tried to appreciate what others have to say even if I have not completely grasped their meaning (one can but try). Unfortunately many of my peers away from the screen in front of me have little interest in such discourse, choosing rather to focus on what they know and pay scant attention to what evolves elsewhere in the world, so there is little chance to exercise the mind openly.
Not that I find all of this a mere operation in abstracts. If I can attempt to understand it surely others more intimately connected will also?

I'm aware that I currently have a tendency to introspection and bleakness; a result of where I find myself in life at the moment. I've avoided comment in several threads, even gone as far as to write a post and then delete it without submitting it on a few occasions. A quality of self doubt perhaps.

What is most clear to me from looking at all the worlds problems is this surreal capacity for people to be so split by their, our nature, at once great and terrible, sometimes more terrible than I could have entertained in my own savagery. Yet history demonstrates the only trait that holds true to our continuation - our love of war and how our world is bound by it. Yes there are other things that are truly great, but only the really terrible speak through the ages with such encompassing clarity that we are still so good at it.

I think your wall of text is more concise than mine... by the time I got around to it further editing of text and response has kept me at it for more hours than I intended and to change it now will see me here until sunrise. So enough already.

[JSLTIGER]

Originally Posted by jumpy

I have to admit, I only viewed the link and discounted the rest of the site and it's other probable bias - putting my thoughts on the matter coherently was meandering enough already. Anyway, I stated in passing as such to mark the sometime response to issues like this one. Worth mentioning only for the sake of giving the OP some benefit of the doubt as to motivations in the discussion, and not particularly as a dig at any individual or anything like that; but it is a thing that seems sometimes so intimately connected with the subject of israel that it is often hard to avoid. The same can be said of the opposing palestinian viewpoint.

. . .

Taking the images at their face value, as alluded to in this thread already, would seem to be the most direct way to see through the diametric arguments.
In which case there is a strong similarity to the image comparison. Verisimilitude is a better word for it. And that's where I looked at the motivation to both interpretations (pro/anti israel/palestinian), either way of looking at it passes over the very real suffering shown in both, to the end that I found each to be misleading as a statement of an agenda. At least from my own perspective, such as it is.
The comparison is divisive from either end of the spectrum and therefore almost impossible to see on its own. I think this is the intent of the originator of the link; invidious it certainly is. But that was what I was trying to avoid.

As a direct response to you JSLTIGER, I see no reason why you should 'admit' to being jewish - I did find that an odd way to put it if I'm honest. I'm not criticising, it struck me more that you see it very differently, or with more weight than I. But there's no cause to 'admit' - the term for me carries some implication of guilt, where I certainly see none that is relevant here in this matter or anywhere else. I'm not sure I expressed that right or that I took it in the manner you intended.

I'm going to work backwards here and start with a quick response to what you wrote last, first. The reason I used the word "admit" was not because I feel guilty in the slightest, but rather merely intended to convey an understanding of my own biases in my writings and viewpoint, especially in regards to this topic, where I find myself to be very close to the subject matter.

I understand how you can see similarities in the two sets of photos, because that is precisely the point that the site was attempting to get across. What I was trying to point out, however, is that I think that it is negligent to ignore the context in which these photos were taken and the motivations behind the selections of photos used for the comparison. There is an agenda behind the selection of each of the photos used for the comparison, and to ignore that seems a bit disingenuous to me. Additionally, the fact that several of these photos (the modern ones anyway) could clearly be the result of optical illusions on film should also be taken into account.

I suppose what I am saying is really that it is all about context, context, context. The problem with this site and the photographic comparison is that there is no context provided, and consequently imagery that looks similar likely has been distorted from very different realities.