![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 7
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
In the patrol where I sunk the Aquitania I ended with almost 100.000 tons
![]() As far as I remember the Aquitania is 44.000 tons, so just 55.000 for 2 Aquitania is too low ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 137
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah I must have miss-remembered the tonnage - that number stuck in my head after I had sunk the FIRST Aquatania!
![]() SH3 Commander says my final tonnage was 99,859. I can't do screen shots because I'm running the Hi Res mod, which causes SH3 to crash if I try to do a screen shot or even if I try to do a screen cap with FRAPS. But, here is my log from SH3 Commander. http://i.imgur.com/KTAnV.png Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I find radar detection and a good watch crew are more useful than the snorkle. The snorkel is useful when you absolutely need to recharge and can't surface. Steve |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah I just ran the tonnage numbers and the 54K was before I nailed that last Aquatania. Guess I was counting up my tonnages and was happy just with that! Then I bagged another one!
Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|