![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() And now I need help to adjust this in SH5 (as I do this very easy via S3D in SH3) ! Best regards, Magic ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,776
Downloads: 833
Uploads: 11
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() so can you point me where to read some inf about UZO to see what was for real? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
There was nothing magical about the UZO. It was a simple pair of binoculars strapped to a fixed point. No rangefinding mechanism, although you could send the bearing. If you look at the photos I posted above, the UZO was fixed with a large axis on each side so you could pivot it up and down and keep a ship fixed even though the U-boat's bow was going up and down. However, since the "stabilizing" was done by the crewman, it would not work in very heavy seas. Furthermore, there is no stabilizing whatsoever for waves coming from the side. Now let's look at the periscope. True, there is no stabilizing mechanism whatsoever, but that is because you don't need one. A sub underwater at 45-60 feet is much less affected by surface waves, so less side to side movement than if it is on the surface. In respect of fore and aft movement, you have the entire 220+ feet length of the hull underwater acting as a stabilizer, so little movement that way either. so, you have two options, either of which can be seen as correct: 1. scope stabilized, UZO not stabilized; 2. scope stabilized, UZO stabilised; options 1 and 2 are already available in all SH games. however option 3: scope not stabilized, UZO stabilized is not historically correct.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Silent Hunter
![]() |
![]()
I agree with these posts:
http://174.123.69.202/~subsimc/radio...40&postcount=6 3rd post from above: http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...2/m/8311049103 and my sources in my historical books ! ![]() Best regards, Magic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Again he makes a claim with no verification at all. It's worthless. Quote:
__________________
Never do anything you can't take back. Rocky Russo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I have been thinking about how this could work.
When you are standing on the deck of a boat travelling forward, there is a lot of motion up and down as the boat pushes through a wave. (more so than side sway) Now if I am used to standing on this deck (sea legs) I can sway with the movement of the boat. So my head is always parallel to the sea. If I had a stick in front of me that was free moving forward and back and fixed to deck, I could hold this against myself and continue my sway. So I become the stabilizer. If this was binos and could also pivot at the head - perhaps a steady view could be achieved. Last edited by Trevally.; 03-03-11 at 01:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() So, I asked a former submarine driver of german Navy (Bundesmarine) in my german ubi-forum and he answerded me the following (Iīve translate his answer via google, because my english is not so good): Please look first this picture: http://www.u-995.com/images/galerie/...kenwanne02.jpg and then read his answer: "In the pictures of the bridge when can we see the column of the torpedo target device or the UZO base very well. The upper range (ie where the UZO is placed), is from the surrounding ring with the degree numbers must be clearly separated. Somehow reminds me of the process with the support of a magnetic compass, which is indeed suspended freely to compensate for the ship's movements. This makes sense since the UZO was indeed used in case of water attacks, so a submarine, even at low wave heights ever is rocked by something stronger. It would therefore only logical that a telescopic sight would be stabilized in accordance." Best regards, Magic ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Never do anything you can't take back. Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This question keeps coming up and from what I can see is based solely on the fact that this is the way it works in SH3! However, SH3 is a game, not a reference guide.
For more empirical evidence, I would rather rely on the inspection report of the U-570, a type VIIc which was captured in august 1941: http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-570ONIReport.htm this is what it says about the UZO (p.59-60): Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|