SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-11, 07:27 PM   #16
Obersteuermann
Shore leave
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 70
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

I tried intercepting a few TFs once I'd installed the warships mod. All I ever came across (in mid-1940, anyway) were flotillas of torpedo boats.

Which are even more annoying in a battleship than in a u-boat! At least you can dive away from them in the submarine....
Obersteuermann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-11, 05:17 AM   #17
VONHARRIS
Konteradmiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,992
Downloads: 300
Uploads: 0
Default

I try to avoid them.
If I run into one I will engage , but I will not go looking for major trouble by intercepting them especially after late 1942.
VONHARRIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-11, 07:59 PM   #18
Tessa
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkIpetrucci View Post
Since I am playing in single mod on 100% realistic mode, I usually avoid task forces. On multiplayer, it's a total different thing, you have the power of the wolfpack with you.
Realism has nothing to do with the decision to hunt TF's or let them pass through; unless you had legitimate reason to avoid one (like lack of fuel or only 1 eel left) and you were in interception range you could have consequences waiting for you when you arrived home. Since long range flight was just beginning to take root with B-17's where one could fly from New York to London non-stop travel by ship was still the primary method of travel. During his several visits to the US Churchill made most via boat (King George V); had a u-boat been alerted to the Task Force's presence and attacked it (not knowing the invaluable cargo it had) a single torpedo could have drastically changed the way events unfolded.

Logistically hunting and damaging large warships was an enormous benefit that wasn't realized until after the war and the German's were able to see all the allied records of damaged ships. The time and materials a BB would take to repair (and usually monopolize a dry dock for at least several weeks-months) was enormous. Had warships been the primary target (like in WWI) if nothing more than to put them out of commission it would have had a measurable effect (granted the outcome would have likely been the same, getting there would have been much more difficult).
Tessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-11, 09:35 PM   #19
Missing Name
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 748
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0
Default

I go by the size of the little diamond that shows up on the map. The larger it is, the more likely something valuable is inside of it. Likewise, the faster it is, the better but harder to hit.

Although occasionally you get news of a very small taskforce, listed as simply "warship." I intercepted one once and it was the Hood and the Prince of Wales, unescorted.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive.



Read Brag's stuff
Missing Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-11, 07:29 AM   #20
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tessa View Post
Realism has nothing to do with the decision to hunt TF's or let them pass through; unless you had legitimate reason to avoid one (like lack of fuel or only 1 eel left) and you were in interception range you could have consequences waiting for you when you arrived home. Since long range flight was just beginning to take root with B-17's where one could fly from New York to London non-stop travel by ship was still the primary method of travel. During his several visits to the US Churchill made most via boat (King George V); had a u-boat been alerted to the Task Force's presence and attacked it (not knowing the invaluable cargo it had) a single torpedo could have drastically changed the way events unfolded.

Logistically hunting and damaging large warships was an enormous benefit that wasn't realized until after the war and the German's were able to see all the allied records of damaged ships. The time and materials a BB would take to repair (and usually monopolize a dry dock for at least several weeks-months) was enormous. Had warships been the primary target (like in WWI) if nothing more than to put them out of commission it would have had a measurable effect (granted the outcome would have likely been the same, getting there would have been much more difficult).
The IJN shared your views, and failed miserably.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-11, 02:05 PM   #21
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,552
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

LOL
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-11, 04:19 PM   #22
Tessa
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snestorm View Post
The IJN shared your views, and failed miserably.
The IJN fatal flaw was in its targets - they should have been flat tops rather than capital ships from the get go. The Japanese knew that the carrier based planes were going to be the decididing factor, but (luckily) had some holdouts that pulled the progress back allowing us to recover from our wounds and get back to full strength.
Tessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-11, 05:11 AM   #23
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tessa View Post
The IJN fatal flaw was in its targets - they should have been flat tops rather than capital ships from the get go. The Japanese knew that the carrier based planes were going to be the decididing factor, but (luckily) had some holdouts that pulled the progress back allowing us to recover from our wounds and get back to full strength.
We see the world differently, which is fine.

In my view, the japanese missed the most important target at Pearl Harbor.
The fleet oil reserves went untouched.
Had those reserves been destroyed USA's problems would have been ten-fold.
Submarines patroling west of the Panama Canal, and along USA's west coast with the primary goal of sinking tankers, in my estimation, would have been sound.
If a big ship presents itself as a target fine, as they too used the canal.

Oil makes the world go 'round.
Churchill learned it. Hitler learned it. Stalin learned it.
And Japan went to war with USA because Mr Roosevelt threatened japanese access to it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-11, 06:54 PM   #24
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,552
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

^ good post.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-11, 06:03 AM   #25
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna View Post
^ good post.
Thank you, Sir.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-11, 04:39 PM   #26
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,552
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snestorm View Post
Thank you, Sir.
Your most welcome
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-11, 07:42 PM   #27
klh
Der Alte
 
klh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 227
Downloads: 200
Uploads: 0
Default

If mathematically possible, I plot an intercept course. Ideally I like to arrive in a position on their course and lie in wait, timing it so they arrive at dusk (easier for me to escape in the dark).

After all, that's what I'm here for.
klh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-11, 08:08 PM   #28
Gereke
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 76
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

I run like a sissy girl from them.

I'm out on a pleasure cruise! Attack a task force? What madness!



In reality it seems like every time I get a report of a task force I'm too far away to even bother to intercept. I've only made contact with a TF once, and I stumbled across it while stalking the western approaches to Gibraltar. 2 DD's, a Cruiser that I didn't bother to ID, and the reason for not bothering with the Cruiser... HMS Nelson. Out of pure coincidental luck I was in position for a text book attack. All I had to do was let them come to me. Four eels later the Nelson was on her way down, and I made my escape.
Gereke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.