LuftWolf and Amizaur's Weapons and Sensors Realism Mod

Mau · 10-30-05, 08:33 AM

Luftwolf and Molon Labe,

This is by far for me the most interesting Topic to discuss
(Can we please put that one on the main one - the general topics, may be under another name like ``Detection of SSM``)

Like you are saying I think the behavior looks all right.
Let say I am well implicated in this in RL. The fact that there is no indication prior to a detection of let say inside 20nm (which is real life - Radar horizon + Atmospheric condition/effect depended and height of sensors) will absolutely take more time to engage that same missile. The assessment of an OPs Team in this has to be quick. Secondly, as in RL, the lock with the FCR will not be immediate (sometimes way faster than other).
If linked by an helicopter, the team knows at that time so as soon as there is a ``Pop-up`` on the same bearing and same speed has reported by link or previous Intel than you are right on top of it with your assessment.
Unfortunately like I was saying couple of weeks ago, we don`t have an altitude provided with our FCR like in RL or automatically (3D Radar) with AEGIS. Than you can assesses if it is a Fighter attack Bomber (usually 500ft) or an SSM (0 feet or on the deck).

I am really really interested in your testing with this!
I know with a ship without AEGIS, even though you have an hostile Link track you can`t engaged until you have it on your FCR radar and locked on the track that has a blip under it. Now I have to find out with AEGIS equiped ship. I don`t think so too. However they shall be able to engaged a bit faster (like in your testing) because of that 3D availability that they have with the AEGIS and the great ``resolution`` provided by AEGIS radar.
I will find out early for you guys if an AEGIS can engaged a Link track for sure.
I would expect to see more missiles in the air however when attacking a threat (CG - 4 FCR and Arleigh Burke - 3 FCR with all AEGIS controlling in te mid term.

Continue your good work!

Mau

10-30-05, 08:33 AM	#1
Mau Sonar Guy Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 382 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Luftwolf and Molon Labe, This is by far for me the most interesting Topic to discuss (Can we please put that one on the main one - the general topics, may be under another name like ``Detection of SSM``) Like you are saying I think the behavior looks all right. Let say I am well implicated in this in RL. The fact that there is no indication prior to a detection of let say inside 20nm (which is real life - Radar horizon + Atmospheric condition/effect depended and height of sensors) will absolutely take more time to engage that same missile. The assessment of an OPs Team in this has to be quick. Secondly, as in RL, the lock with the FCR will not be immediate (sometimes way faster than other). If linked by an helicopter, the team knows at that time so as soon as there is a ``Pop-up`` on the same bearing and same speed has reported by link or previous Intel than you are right on top of it with your assessment. Unfortunately like I was saying couple of weeks ago, we don`t have an altitude provided with our FCR like in RL or automatically (3D Radar) with AEGIS. Than you can assesses if it is a Fighter attack Bomber (usually 500ft) or an SSM (0 feet or on the deck). I am really really interested in your testing with this! I know with a ship without AEGIS, even though you have an hostile Link track you can`t engaged until you have it on your FCR radar and locked on the track that has a blip under it. Now I have to find out with AEGIS equiped ship. I don`t think so too. However they shall be able to engaged a bit faster (like in your testing) because of that 3D availability that they have with the AEGIS and the great ``resolution`` provided by AEGIS radar. I will find out early for you guys if an AEGIS can engaged a Link track for sure. I would expect to see more missiles in the air however when attacking a threat (CG - 4 FCR and Arleigh Burke - 3 FCR with all AEGIS controlling in te mid term. Continue your good work! Mau