How best to reduce world population - Page 5

Oberon · 01-25-11, 03:40 PM

Resource wars.

Coming to a nation near you soon.

Failing that, dinosaur killer.

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon

Resource wars.

Coming to a nation near you soon.

Failing that, dinosaur killer.

I give it around 65 to 80 years... Then we will have a resource war.

Because our governments are more intrested on makeing a bigger gun, than space technology...

(or just play Justin biber on all the loudspeakers/radios all over the world at one time... Humanity cant deal with that much gay.)

AVGWarhawk · 01-25-11, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Third Man

The question was how to reduce the world population. NOT wether it should be done. If you believe "Soon penicillin will be useless." lets ban it now and stop paying the money.

You don't get it. I don't believe penicillin is useless...the greater medical community know it is growing useless. It is not dead yet and will still kill first strains of bacteria. It is the second strains that cause issue. You are asking how to reduce population. We do not not have to do a thing...bacteria will do that for use so why sit and dwell on how to reduce the population?

Raptor1 · 01-25-11, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Task Force

I give it around 65 to 80 years... Then we will have a resource war.

It will only be until April, 2052 before the Resource Wars break out.

01-25-11, 03:45 PM

The thing that amazes me is the folks who opt for nuclear war as the best way to solve the population problem. The instant, solution, as opposed to the long term solution gives us all a reason to step back and reflect on who we are culturaly. Euros are blood thirsty shelfish gits..

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:46 PM

Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years.

*I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life.

Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of.

STEED · 01-25-11, 03:48 PM

Raptor1 · 01-25-11, 03:49 PM

You wanted the best way to reduce world population, not the best way to "step back and reflect on who we are culturaly". As it stands, the most efficient way to reduce the world's population is widespread use of thermonuclear weapons, if you wanted something else, you should've specified it.

01-25-11, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Task Force

Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years.

*I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life.

Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of.

But since Mr Obama (2009 peace prize winner) I thought I was so perfectable. Silly utopia.

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:50 PM

^, oah, and we could find a way to make the sun age at +1,000,000% that would fix it! And get rid of our solar system!

* ya know, the obama talks are getting old dude... He is so last year.

August · 01-25-11, 04:40 PM

Bio weapons, withholding medicines, war. Is that the best you guys can come up with?

How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die.

razark · 01-25-11, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

Bio weapons, withholding medicines, war. Is that the best you guys can come up with?

How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die.

The problem with that is getting everyone to join in.

AVGWarhawk · 01-25-11, 04:47 PM

Yeah, like the Duggers...

Krauter · 01-25-11, 04:48 PM

Where's the fun in that?

Why don't we just go crazy and then the STI's will take care of us

Respenus · 01-25-11, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die.

Just wanted to post this.

Age my friends is the answer. Time is the fire in which we burn. Limit the world population to a certain number and calculate the precise number of births that just should allow in order to prevent too fast a collapse. It will take a while, it will be a tough ride with all the resource problems, but if you manage to do it, you would have no need to directly kill someone, removing some of the moral problems, as well as ensure that those who do grow up have an increasing amount of resources at their disposal. It's green and its mean

But no, in all seriousness, it is either complete population control or killing on a massive scale though all manner of devices. And still you wouldn't have enough space to bury all the billions of bodies. If we do chose war, than no body lives though the massacre of Humanity. If do take a slow approach and decide to sacrifice a lot in out time so that the following generations will have something to grow upon, then we might still have a slight chance to actually achieve something.

It's the Malthusian dilemma. Do you allow them to die due to hunger, disease, war, etc. or do you take the Huxley way and in one way or another control the birthing process. Any more "humane" ideas out there?

01-25-11, 03:45 PM	#65
The Third Man Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	The thing that amazes me is the folks who opt for nuclear war as the best way to solve the population problem. The instant, solution, as opposed to the long term solution gives us all a reason to step back and reflect on who we are culturaly. Euros are blood thirsty shelfish gits..
	$Received Infraction$

01-25-11, 03:46 PM	#66
Task Force Rear Admiral Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: SPACE!!!! Posts: 10,142 Downloads: 85 Uploads: 0	Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years. I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life. Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of. __________________ Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time"*

01-25-11, 03:48 PM	#67
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	__________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

01-25-11, 03:49 PM	#68
Raptor1 Navy Seal Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Stavka Posts: 8,211 Downloads: 13 Uploads: 0	You wanted the best way to reduce world population, not the best way to "step back and reflect on who we are culturaly". As it stands, the most efficient way to reduce the world's population is widespread use of thermonuclear weapons, if you wanted something else, you should've specified it. __________________ Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory

01-25-11, 03:50 PM	#70
Task Force Rear Admiral Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: SPACE!!!! Posts: 10,142 Downloads: 85 Uploads: 0	^, oah, and we could find a way to make the sun age at +1,000,000% that would fix it! And get rid of our solar system! * ya know, the obama talks are getting old dude... He is so last year. __________________ Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time"

01-25-11, 03:40 PM	#61
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	Resource wars. Coming to a nation near you soon. Failing that, dinosaur killer.

01-25-11, 04:40 PM	#71
August Wayfaring Stranger Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 23,233 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Bio weapons, withholding medicines, war. Is that the best you guys can come up with? How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die. __________________ Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.

01-25-11, 04:47 PM	#73
AVGWarhawk Lucky Jack Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 28,293 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	Yeah, like the Duggers... __________________ “You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road