How best to reduce world population

AVGWarhawk · 01-25-11, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Third Man

That is because of miss use. For every person like myself who doesn't like taking pills there are twice as many who do like it and stop on a penicillin regime before they should.

Continued miss use and the ball already rolling concerning antibotics, there is no reason to ban penicillin. Soon penicillin will be useless. Those ills that penicillin once cured will now kill.

the_tyrant · 01-25-11, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

Continued miss use and the ball already rolling concerning antibotics, there is no reason to ban penicillin. Soon penicillin will be useless. Those ills that penicillin once cured will now kill.

Come up with a theory that developing antibiotics is bad for animals, its like playing god, its bad for the economy etc

soon enough, those groups will come and force the UN to ban antibiotic development
then the bacteria will kill us

AVGWarhawk · 01-25-11, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_tyrant

Come up with a theory that developing antibiotics is bad for animals, its like playing god, its bad for the economy etc

soon enough, those groups will come and force the UN to ban antibiotic development
then the bacteria will kill us

The bacteria is already working on killing us all. Pneumonia today is a very serious issue.

01-25-11, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

Continued miss use and the ball already rolling concerning antibotics, there is no reason to ban penicillin. Soon penicillin will be useless. Those ills that penicillin once cured will now kill.

The question was how to reduce the world population. NOT wether it should be done. If you believe "Soon penicillin will be useless." lets ban it now and stop paying the money.

Oberon · 01-25-11, 03:40 PM

Resource wars.

Coming to a nation near you soon.

Failing that, dinosaur killer.

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon

Resource wars.

Coming to a nation near you soon.

Failing that, dinosaur killer.

I give it around 65 to 80 years... Then we will have a resource war.

Because our governments are more intrested on makeing a bigger gun, than space technology...

(or just play Justin biber on all the loudspeakers/radios all over the world at one time... Humanity cant deal with that much gay.)

Raptor1 · 01-25-11, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Task Force

I give it around 65 to 80 years... Then we will have a resource war.

It will only be until April, 2052 before the Resource Wars break out.

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:46 PM

Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years.

*I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life.

Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of.

STEED · 01-25-11, 03:48 PM

01-25-11, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Task Force

Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years.

*I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life.

Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of.

But since Mr Obama (2009 peace prize winner) I thought I was so perfectable. Silly utopia.

01-25-11, 03:45 PM

The thing that amazes me is the folks who opt for nuclear war as the best way to solve the population problem. The instant, solution, as opposed to the long term solution gives us all a reason to step back and reflect on who we are culturaly. Euros are blood thirsty shelfish gits..

Raptor1 · 01-25-11, 03:49 PM

You wanted the best way to reduce world population, not the best way to "step back and reflect on who we are culturaly". As it stands, the most efficient way to reduce the world's population is widespread use of thermonuclear weapons, if you wanted something else, you should've specified it.

Task Force · 01-25-11, 03:50 PM

^, oah, and we could find a way to make the sun age at +1,000,000% that would fix it! And get rid of our solar system!

* ya know, the obama talks are getting old dude... He is so last year.

August · 01-25-11, 04:40 PM

Bio weapons, withholding medicines, war. Is that the best you guys can come up with?

How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die.

AVGWarhawk · 01-25-11, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Third Man

The question was how to reduce the world population. NOT wether it should be done. If you believe "Soon penicillin will be useless." lets ban it now and stop paying the money.

You don't get it. I don't believe penicillin is useless...the greater medical community know it is growing useless. It is not dead yet and will still kill first strains of bacteria. It is the second strains that cause issue. You are asking how to reduce population. We do not not have to do a thing...bacteria will do that for use so why sit and dwell on how to reduce the population?

01-25-11, 03:46 PM	#8
Task Force Rear Admiral Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: SPACE!!!! Posts: 10,142 Downloads: 85 Uploads: 0	Oah goodie, So. we have anouther 41 years. I though all of humanity where blood thirsty selfish gits, Its human nature. Hell id say its the natural way of all life. Nature is a violent thing, Its not this peacful thing everyone thinks of. __________________ Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time"*

01-25-11, 03:48 PM	#9
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	__________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

01-25-11, 03:45 PM	#11
The Third Man Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	The thing that amazes me is the folks who opt for nuclear war as the best way to solve the population problem. The instant, solution, as opposed to the long term solution gives us all a reason to step back and reflect on who we are culturaly. Euros are blood thirsty shelfish gits..
	$Received Infraction$

01-25-11, 03:49 PM	#12
Raptor1 Navy Seal Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Stavka Posts: 8,211 Downloads: 13 Uploads: 0	You wanted the best way to reduce world population, not the best way to "step back and reflect on who we are culturaly". As it stands, the most efficient way to reduce the world's population is widespread use of thermonuclear weapons, if you wanted something else, you should've specified it. __________________ Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory

01-25-11, 03:50 PM	#13
Task Force Rear Admiral Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: SPACE!!!! Posts: 10,142 Downloads: 85 Uploads: 0	^, oah, and we could find a way to make the sun age at +1,000,000% that would fix it! And get rid of our solar system! * ya know, the obama talks are getting old dude... He is so last year. __________________ Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time"

01-25-11, 03:40 PM	#5
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	Resource wars. Coming to a nation near you soon. Failing that, dinosaur killer.

01-25-11, 04:40 PM	#14
August Wayfaring Stranger Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 23,226 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Bio weapons, withholding medicines, war. Is that the best you guys can come up with? How about simply keeping our flies zipped up? All we have to do is keep a negative birthrate for a short while and the problem will be solved with nobody having to die. __________________ Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.