![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]()
Not that I'm aware of.
"good moral character" is ill defined in the regulations.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Sounds like the guy they need in the banking world, they're running short of them at the moment!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]() Quote:
nothing except "Good Moral Character." however, the term "Good moral character" is a widely accepted legal term in legal documents. the term automatically describes by default, a number of actions that the individual in question must never have been involved with. according to several sources i took the time to look at, these actions include... Murder Rape Sexual abuse of a minor Trafficking of the usual bad things (guns, drugs people) Money laundering violent crime, or theft or burglary (requiring one or more years in prison) Crimes requiring a demand for ransom Crimes involving child porn Two or more gambling offenses Pimpin' hos Crimes against Uncle Sam Any offense which jeopardize national security Any offense involving fraud or deceit which causes a loss of $10K+ Tax evasion Smuggling Illegal Aliens Passport Fraud Obstruction of Justice Perjury Witness Tampering Failure to appear in court (depending upon the reason and accusation) Any two offenses that involved a sentence of 5 or more years Imprisonment in the past "X" years. (x being dependent on local law) Any involvement in prostitution Being an alcoholic Polygamy Failure to support dependent children False Testimony Failure to register for selective service Providing false information in documents False claims of citizenship (basically all the fun stuff, mixed in with a couple of major no-nos) I have taken the liberty of boldng the ones they may have him on. though i seriously doubt he would see a revocation... it is a possibility i would think.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|