SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-15-05, 11:06 AM   #7
Deathblow
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Well IMHO the USN can't figure out what the heck it wants. By the time they invest resources into one naval philosophy, that philosophy has already been rendered obsolete, so its unwilling to put too many eggs in one basket. There are also too many potential technologies and concepts, which challenge old design paradiagms, that they want to try out which is stalling a long-term investment.

Or maybe the USN knows what it needs, but its so different than the previous philosophy of "supersubs" that its been hard to bring itself to invest in smaller and cheaper designs. Old habits are hard to break so the Virginia was sortof a half way point between the "super subs" that the USN was used too and the "small cheap and easy" subs that analyst were recommending. Maybe now that a little more time has past the Navy is ready to change its design philosophies even more.

Oh well, guess we will have to wait until China's Navy progresses to start challenging parts of the Pacific and Indian Ocean, before we see the next "Super Sub"
Deathblow is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.