SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-10, 09:44 AM   #1
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,293
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
What helped GM, the bailout, or the restructuring?
Ultimately restructuring. Pontiac just died a silent death last week. Saturn died a silent death. Oldsmobile died two years ago. What is left? Chevy, GMC, Caddy and Buick. If not for the Chinese loving Buicks this arm of the GM company would have gone the route of silent death.

However, the bailout did allow GM to silently restructure. I do not feel GM is a survivor though.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 09:55 AM   #2
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

What the article failed to mention.....

But GM warned that it expects fourth-quarter operating profit to come in well below the level of the first three quarters of the year because it is pulling back on production of trucks and making more small cars, which have narrower margins.

and........the gouging of the very folks who own GM.

GM's results indicate the company's North American unit earned an average of $3,005 on every vehicle it made in the third quarter, a reflection of its drive to boost truck output during the summer. GM also is commanding higher prices for cars and smaller sport-utility vehicles. By comparison, Ford Motor Co. earned $2,710 on each vehicle it produced in North America in the quarter, and Chrysler Group LLC earned $593 per vehicle.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...306436706.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 10:01 AM   #3
the_tyrant
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
Default

What caused the problem at GM?
is it because of the managements bad management?
Or was it that they over payed their employees?
the_tyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 10:22 AM   #4
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant View Post
What caused the problem at GM?
is it because of the managements bad management?
Or was it that they over payed their employees?
Yes.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 10:31 AM   #5
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,293
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant View Post
What caused the problem at GM?
is it because of the managements bad management?
Or was it that they over payed their employees?
Add some of the ugliest vehicles you have ever laid eyes on as well.

Really, wth:



A car they should never have killed:



Toss in some unreliablity and voila!.....the accounts are in the red and operating in the negative.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 10:51 AM   #6
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Ah this may explain their projections a little.

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/11...leet-vehicles/

GE huh... of course what goes around comes around.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-40686707.html
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 01:27 PM   #7
gimpy117
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 3,243
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
Ah this may explain their projections a little.

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/11...leet-vehicles/

GE huh... of course what goes around comes around.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-40686707.html
A hybrid fleet vehicle seems like a good idea. Should save money in the long run. Especially because company cars get a lot of use.
__________________
Member of the Subsim Zombie Army
gimpy117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 02:47 PM   #8
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gimpy117 View Post
A hybrid fleet vehicle seems like a good idea. Should save money in the long run. Especially because company cars get a lot of use.
Saves money

1.) Inital investment (they aint cheap)

2.) Equipment to keep them charged (it aint cheap) oh sold by GE by the way.

3.) Maintance (batteries do fail and they aint cheap) "Qualified mechanics required". Given GM's past history of reliability.. Ill bed a damn headlight for these gadgets cost 200 bucks.

4.) Limited range (If you want to travel more than 100 miles your going to have to use a 'normal' car).

I see it as a 'feel good' 'show you care' type of sentiment at best.

At least they found a ready made market for them otherwise it would really had been hard to sell them.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 11:03 AM   #9
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant View Post
What caused the problem at GM?
is it because of the managements bad management?
Or was it that they over payed their employees?
GM was a perfect storm of corporate trouble; poor management, poor business model, excessive benefits, the fleecing of the company by the unions and inferior products to boot. Some companies deserve to go out of business, and GM was one of them.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 11:08 AM   #10
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

The GM bailout was. Union bailout. They should have been allowed to fail. Real reorganization would have nuked pensions etc and still saved the company this was done as payback to the unions by the admin
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 11:14 AM   #11
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

This should help GM, but it may induce a bailout for GE.

GE said Thursday it will buy 25,000 electric vehicles by 2015 in hopes of sparking demand for the emerging market for which it makes charging stations and other infrastructure.

Those charging stations must be very pricey indeed if GE can buy the cars to boost sales of the charging station. Or is it more smoke and mirrors, for which the tax payer will be on the hook.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GE-to-...7&asset=&ccode=
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-10, 11:49 AM   #12
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
This should help GM, but it may induce a bailout for GE.

GE said Thursday it will buy 25,000 electric vehicles by 2015 in hopes of sparking demand for the emerging market for which it makes charging stations and other infrastructure.

Those charging stations must be very pricey indeed if GE can buy the cars to boost sales of the charging station. Or is it more smoke and mirrors, for which the tax payer will be on the hook.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GE-to-...&asset=&ccode=
Guess you missed my post
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.