SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-10, 05:18 PM   #1
ETR3(SS)
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
No. There are no such thing as an accidental launch with nuclear weapons. Too many barriers for that to happen.
This. There is no way in hell that you can accidentally launch a missile. Far too many people involved in the launch process for that to happen.
__________________


USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:35 PM   #2
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
This. There is no way in hell that you can accidentally launch a missile. Far too many people involved in the launch process for that to happen.
I understand that there are too many people involved. What about mechanical or electrical problems?

Once a solid fuel rocket begins burning, it's going somewhere, no matter how it started burning.
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:42 PM   #3
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by razark View Post
I understand that there are too many people involved. What about mechanical or electrical problems?

Once a solid fuel rocket begins burning, it's going somewhere, no matter how it started burning.
But that doesn't jive because there was no nuclear detonation.

Unless you think all SLBMs are toothless. IE no nukes.

I guess we can go back to a test launch during rush hour on the west coast. Back to the Obama Admin playing bad with an unfunny game. To get some legislation passed. I pray that is not the case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:44 PM   #4
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
But that doesn't jive because there was no nuclear detonation.
Huh. Seems someone might have asked about that...

Oh, right:
Quote:
Originally Posted by razark View Post
Would a nuclear warhead have some kind of safety system in place to prevent detonation if a missile were to be accidentally launched?
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:46 PM   #5
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
But that doesn't jive because there was no nuclear detonation.

Unless you think all SLBMs are toothless. IE no nukes.

I guess we can go back to a test launch during rush hour on the west coast. Back to the Obama Admin playing bad with an unfunny game. To get some legislation passed. I pray that is not the case.
Accidentally launching an SLBM would be much easier than accidentally making the warhead go off...
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:51 PM   #6
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The point is ....once launched the warheads are not recallable or able to be disabled in any manner. This isn't hollywood.

Once launched detonation will occur unless it is a test. To allow for any means of self destruct or any interference of the missile in flight removes any usefullness it may have.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:54 PM   #7
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
The point is ....once launched the warheads are not recallable or able to be disabled in any manner. This isn't hollywood.

Once launched detonation will occur unless it is a test. To allow for any means of self destruct or any interference of the missile in flight removes any usefullness it may have.
You know that as a fact?

I would like to believe otherwise.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 06:01 PM   #8
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
You know that as a fact?

I would like to believe otherwise.
IIRC, that is the line that is put out by the US military, that their ICBMs do not have a kill switch. The emphasis is put on avoiding a unintentional launch in the first place.
The trouble with having a kill switch after launch is the possibility of enemy interference making the missiles self-destruct before they reach their targets.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 06:00 PM   #9
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
The point is ....once launched the warheads are not recallable or able to be disabled in any manner. This isn't hollywood.

Once launched detonation will occur unless it is a test. To allow for any means of self destruct or any interference of the missile in flight removes any usefullness it may have.
I would've thought it was the opposite, that no detonation will occur unless it is actually made to detonate before launching.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 06:02 PM   #10
CaptainHaplo
Silent Hunter
 
CaptainHaplo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Likely an airplane, just from one of those odd angles that makes it look like something its not.
__________________
Good Hunting!

Captain Haplo
CaptainHaplo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 06:06 PM   #11
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
I would've thought it was the opposite, that no detonation will occur unless it is actually made to detonate before launching.
All warhead coding/enabling and missile launch codes must be entered prior to launch. Once launched the missile doesn't even need to know where it is...it just needs to know where it is not ...and goes to where it needs to be. Which is part of the launch code.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:47 PM   #12
ETR3(SS)
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by razark View Post
I understand that there are too many people involved. What about mechanical or electrical problems?

Once a solid fuel rocket begins burning, it's going somewhere, no matter how it started burning.
If a missile lights off in the tube, it will more than likely destroy the boat carrying it.
__________________


USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:55 PM   #13
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
If a missile lights off in the tube, it will more than likely destroy the boat carrying it.
Good point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
The point is ....once launched the warheads are not recallable or able to be disabled in any manner.
Let me rephrase my question, then:
Does the warhead need to be armed before launch (as part of the button-pressing, key-turning fun the movies portray), or is it automatically armed when the missile leaves the tube, or is it sitting ready to go on top of the missile waiting for the command to detonate it?
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 05:57 PM   #14
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
If a missile lights off in the tube, it will more than likely destroy the boat carrying it.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.