Liberal Activist Attacked by Zealous Conservative

[Freiwillige]

Just speculation here but whose to say that the guys that ripped her to the ground and stepped on her head (Ever so lighty might I point out, wasn't exactly a skinhead boot party) weren't in on the whole thing? Move on.org and their ilk have a history of fraudulent schemes.

Not saying that is the case and it probably isn't but just presenting another option as in this day and age anything is possible.

Also I would like to say that I feel sorry for people such as this girl who live in the fantasy land of leftist division who see corporate republican conspiracy every where. The youth are brainwashed in higher education and come out whacko's.

Its funny because Communist's always use that same class\racial warfare struggle to gain power. Its an old playbook yet it almost never fails.

When are we going to come together as American's and try to solve these problems on a whole without the division?

[CCIP]

Originally Posted by Freiwillige

Its funny because Communist's always use that same class\racial warfare struggle to gain power. Its an old playbook yet it almost never fails.

Could that possibly because there's, you know, a lot of injustice and inequality in societies like even the US? But sure, let's call it a communist conspiracy instead of addressing it as part of the political process...

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by CCIP

Could that possibly because there's, you know, a lot of injustice and inequality in societies like even the US? But sure, let's call it a communist conspiracy instead of addressing it as part of the political process...

I am so sick of hearing about injustice and inequality, it's a major selling point of the Left, they exploit the less fortunate and un or undereducated, disgusting.Guess what, everyone is not equal when it comes to $, just how it is.The individual's job is to do their best to make it, not whine or expect others to pick up their slack.

[Bubblehead1980]

On the whole stomping incident...

watch the video again, she was trying to shove her sign into Rand Paul's vehicle at the begining unless that was edited it out, I just saw it earlier on tv.Although this goober was not security he felt his candidate was in danger, so along with others they took her down, which was absolutely justified(women can do harm to candidates also, remember the wacko who tried to shoot Gerald Ford?) Now this idiot shouldnt have put his foot on her but he didnt "stomp" her, that is a gross overstatement.Looked more like he was watching out while using his foot to hold her down, should not have done it but lets not go overboard as the Left wing media is trying to do.Look up this moonbat's interview with Keith Olberman(disgusting individual that he is) from last night, she is off her rocker yet they are trying portray everyone else as so.

Bottom line, the Left knows they are losing and most of the citizens have finally realized how dangerous and just WRONG Left wing ideology and policies are, so they are acting like babies, getting desperate etc, kind of fun to watch but highly annoying.Six days....

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

On the whole stomping incident...

watch the video again, she was trying to shove her sign into Rand Paul's vehicle at the begining unless that was edited it out, I just saw it earlier on tv.Although this goober was not security he felt his candidate was in danger, so along with others they took her down, which was absolutely justified(women can do harm to candidates also, remember the wacko who tried to shoot Gerald Ford?)

Bull.

YOU DON'T TACKLE AND STOMP/STEP ON/TICKLE WITH YOUR FOOT OTHER PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THEIR POLITICS.

What's scary is that there's people like you who believe this sort of thing is justified.

[August]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Bull.

YOU DON'T TACKLE AND STOMP/STEP ON/TICKLE WITH YOUR FOOT OTHER PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THEIR POLITICS.

What's scary is that there's people like you who believe this sort of thing is justified.

What part is bull? The part where she tried to assault Rand Paul or the part where she was assaulted herself?

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by August

What part is bull? The part where she tried to assault Rand Paul or the part where she was assaulted herself?

The part where people try to make this yahoo thug out to be a hero like he jumped in front of a bullet. No one was in any danger.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Bull.

YOU DON'T TACKLE AND STOMP/STEP ON/TICKLE WITH YOUR FOOT OTHER PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THEIR POLITICS.

What's scary is that there's people like you who believe this sort of thing is justified.

They didnt take her down and he did not hold her down with his foot because of her political views, she got too close, was in disguise and tried to put her sign in the car, she had some package or something also.Tensions are high, I hate to say it but I would not be surprised if some wacked out Lefty tries to take out one of the candidates.They felt she was threatening Paul so they took her down, absolutely justified.I bet if someone did the same to some Dem candidate you'd say "oh te crazy tea partier was trying to harm so and so" and I would agree they deserved to be taken down even though I dislike the candidate .This wacko was asking for trouble and she got it.Now as I said, prob shouldnt have put his foot on her but its a technique used, seen cops do it, it works, no real harm, if he stomped her she would be in hospital.So lets get off the false outrage soapbox

Honestly, this girl seems like she may be borderline retarded, and I am not saying this as an insult.I watched her on Lord Douche Olberman's show last night in addition just watched this edited version of the video on youtube with her post incident interview, she seems a bit slow.Would not surprise me if moveon sent a borderline retarded person out for something like that.The Left certainly likes to exploit the weaker among us for their own political gain.

EDITED video, does not show the entire incident:

Absolutely correct. It had nothing to do with her politics. It had everything to do with a threat scenerio.

[UnderseaLcpl]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Bull.

YOU DON'T TACKLE AND STOMP/STEP ON/TICKLE WITH YOUR FOOT OTHER PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THEIR POLITICS.

What's scary is that there's people like you who believe this sort of thing is justified.

Mookie is absolutely right. Doubly so when one considers that this was a Rand Paul rally and the ideals he stands for.

Yeah, the fact that a liberal tried to infiltrate the rally and pull some horse**** stunt is pretty annoying. Yeah, there are many of us who are quite fed up with the liberal agenda, and how insidious it is. Yeah, the lady who tried to sabatoge the rally was a total bitch.

Even so, the act of restraining and hurting her is completely inexcusable, thrice so when the people performing the act are supposedly supporters of a libertarian agenda.

Why not let her make a fool of herself? Why not let her demonstrate to the public that her view is what it really is? Having a wigged, phony sign-bearer is pure political captial, and yet a few members of the Paul rally chose to attack her, instead.

The fact of the matter is that these people are really pissed off, even to the point of forsaking their own ideals. I sincerely doubt that they put the thought I've put into this post before they decided to step on that woman's head. Or shoulder. Or whatever. It doesn't matter. The use of force or coercion against another person who has not forced or coerced anyone is never acceptable.

[Aramike]

Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl

Mookie is absolutely right. Doubly so when one considers that this was a Rand Paul rally and the ideals he stands for.

Yeah, the fact that a liberal tried to infiltrate the rally and pull some horse**** stunt is pretty annoying. Yeah, there are many of us who are quite fed up with the liberal agenda, and how insidious it is. Yeah, the lady who tried to sabatoge the rally was a total bitch.

Even so, the act of restraining and hurting her is completely inexcusable, thrice so when the people performing the act are supposedly supporters of a libertarian agenda.

Why not let her make a fool of herself? Why not let her demonstrate to the public that her view is what it really is? Having a wigged, phony sign-bearer is pure political captial, and yet a few members of the Paul rally chose to attack her, instead.

The fact of the matter is that these people are really pissed off, even to the point of forsaking their own ideals. I sincerely doubt that they put the thought I've put into this post before they decided to step on that woman's head. Or shoulder. Or whatever. It doesn't matter. The use of force or coercion against another person who has not forced or coerced anyone is never acceptable.

Considering the circumstances I can understand restraining her. What I don't understand is the lack of restraint by some involved in restraining her.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl

Mookie is absolutely right. Doubly so when one considers that this was a Rand Paul rally and the ideals he stands for.

Yeah, the fact that a liberal tried to infiltrate the rally and pull some horse**** stunt is pretty annoying. Yeah, there are many of us who are quite fed up with the liberal agenda, and how insidious it is. Yeah, the lady who tried to sabatoge the rally was a total bitch.

Even so, the act of restraining and hurting her is completely inexcusable, thrice so when the people performing the act are supposedly supporters of a libertarian agenda.

Why not let her make a fool of herself? Why not let her demonstrate to the public that her view is what it really is? Having a wigged, phony sign-bearer is pure political captial, and yet a few members of the Paul rally chose to attack her, instead.

The fact of the matter is that these people are really pissed off, even to the point of forsaking their own ideals. I sincerely doubt that they put the thought I've put into this post before they decided to step on that woman's head. Or shoulder. Or whatever. It doesn't matter. The use of force or coercion against another person who has not forced or coerced anyone is never acceptable.

Again, they felt Paul was in possible danger and took her down, completely justified.Using his foot to hold her down or "stomp" as some have mislabled it, prob shouldnt have done that but she wasnt harmed, she is okay.

Find the unedited video online(hard to) but I saw it on CNN earlier as well as Fox, it shows where she shoved her sign into front passenger window Paul's vehicle as he arrived then kept trying to get close once he emerged.Apparently Paul didnt have any real security which he should, so supporters of his took action as they should.What if she had been another "Squeaky From"(the woman who tried to shoot Gerald Ford) she could have taken out Paul.So taking her down was justified, the foot hold was justified but not the best course of action, although as mentioned, justified.

[gimpy117]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

On the whole stomping incident...

watch the video again, she was trying to shove her sign into Rand Paul's vehicle at the begining unless that was edited it out, I just saw it earlier on tv.Although this goober was not security he felt his candidate was in danger, so along with others they took her down, which was absolutely justified(women can do harm to candidates also, remember the wacko who tried to shoot Gerald Ford?)

yeah, well thats all wonderful except you forgot the part where they stomped on her head. She was already restrained on the ground. If their goal was to be "good citizens" and restrain here they would have stopped at the part where 2 guys were on top of her holding her down. This was just violence.

[tater]

Originally Posted by gimpy117

yeah, well thats all wonderful except you forgot the part where they stomped on her head. She was already restrained on the ground. If their goal was to be "good citizens" and restrain here they would have stopped at the part where 2 guys were on top of her holding her down. This was just violence.

Except they didn't "stomp" on her head. Looks more like held her down with a foot. Put a cantaloupe on the floor. Stomp it.

Messy, no?

[gimpy117]

Originally Posted by tater

Except they didn't "stomp" on her head. Looks more like held her down with a foot. Put a cantaloupe on the floor. Stomp it.

Messy, no?

except it was after the fact and pointless. he just wanted to bash her in the head