SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-10, 09:30 PM   #1
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 View Post
.How do explain the vast difference in the Cachalot and Balaos test depth? Perhaps Balao was all welded construction.Not sure.
Difference was in material and quanity used.

The material difference was balao's (and tench's) High tensile steel. On top of that, the steel plating used was thicker.

Gato and boats preceeding it used a softer steel. Not high tensile steel, and the quanity used was slightly less in thickness.

Thus the nickname of "thick skinned" and "thin skinned" boats.

edit:
more detailed info here
http://www.submarineresearch.com/bull31.html

edit: And i had the part about the thickness of the steel increasing wrong. It was all in the material used.

Last edited by Ducimus; 10-18-10 at 09:40 PM.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 08:53 AM   #2
WarlordATF
Frogman
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 288
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
Default

The USS Pike was the first all welded construction according to what i have read. I think the others may have been partial welded construction. Check the second paragraph in this link.

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87.../subsaga6.html
__________________
WarlordATF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 02:42 PM   #3
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,118
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarlordATF View Post
The USS Pike was the first all welded construction according to what i have read. I think the others may have been partial welded construction. Check the second paragraph in this link.

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87.../subsaga6.html
Hmmm I thought all the Porpoise class were riveted.Currently reading the book "Luck of the Draw" by Captain C. Kenneth Ruiz(Ret) again.Ruiz was aboard the Pollack, he mentions the sub was riveted. Although they were once forced to 500 feet during an out of control dive, rivets and things were popping out and shooting everywhere.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 04:01 PM   #4
WarlordATF
Frogman
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 288
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 View Post
Hmmm I thought all the Porpoise class were riveted.Currently reading the book "Luck of the Draw" by Captain C. Kenneth Ruiz(Ret) again.Ruiz was aboard the Pollack, he mentions the sub was riveted. Although they were once forced to 500 feet during an out of control dive, rivets and things were popping out and shooting everywhere.
I'm thinking it was based on which shipyard built the boat. I have also read that the USS Shark SS-174 was of all welded construction and i believe the Tarpon was also, which was one of the reasons these two boats were often considered Shark Class instead of Porpoise. I have looked at a couple dive videos of the USS Tarpon and i can't really say for sure one way or the other.

Its actually kind of confusing since some sources claim the USS Shark was the first all welded construction.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...hip/ss-174.htm
__________________
WarlordATF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 04:04 PM   #5
I'm goin' down
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Notify command we have entered the Grass Sea
Posts: 2,822
Downloads: 813
Uploads: 0
Default Floven re comment that torpedoes are set too run too deep

Early war torpedoes ran deep, so set them for shallow runs.
I'm goin' down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:52 PM   #6
subskipper53
Seaman
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Running Silent, Running Deep
Posts: 41
Downloads: 190
Uploads: 0
Default

A small tip, Floven.

Under NO circumstances should you go below 700 feet in a Balao. It will only spell your doom. This is because it takes a while to finally level out, and by that time you're probably at 800-something.... Balao boats, in TMO (1.9 anyway, not sure about 1.76...), will go to crap at 8-0-3 feet on the dot!

Also, for the Gato, 550 should be the max depth you want to consider. At precisely 597 is when you take a permenant trip to Davy Jones' Locker.

As for the older subs, excluding to S-Boat, you can go 200 feet below test depth (i.e, 250 = max 450).

As for the S-Boat, well.... don't go below 300, trust me.

Good Hunting, and good luck in your patrols!
subskipper53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 11:06 PM   #7
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,118
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by subskipper53 View Post
A small tip, Floven.

Under NO circumstances should you go below 700 feet in a Balao. It will only spell your doom. This is because it takes a while to finally level out, and by that time you're probably at 800-something.... Balao boats, in TMO (1.9 anyway, not sure about 1.76...), will go to crap at 8-0-3 feet on the dot!

Also, for the Gato, 550 should be the max depth you want to consider. At precisely 597 is when you take a permenant trip to Davy Jones' Locker.

As for the older subs, excluding to S-Boat, you can go 200 feet below test depth (i.e, 250 = max 450).

As for the S-Boat, well.... don't go below 300, trust me.

Good Hunting, and good luck in your patrols!

I've been to 815 feet in a Balao once...didnt implode, think it was TMO 1.6 or 1.7, was a while back.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-10, 05:19 PM   #8
subskipper53
Seaman
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Running Silent, Running Deep
Posts: 41
Downloads: 190
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 View Post
I've been to 815 feet in a Balao once...didnt implode, think it was TMO 1.6 or 1.7, was a while back.
Hmm, well i guess you`re just lucky then!


:sidenote: i`m typing this on my new amazon kindle.

Last edited by subskipper53; 10-20-10 at 08:24 PM.
subskipper53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.