"German multicultural society has failed" - Merkel

[Skybird]

One has to see that in the current situational context. In Germany, we have had a series of book releases in the past months, namely "Das Ende der Geduld" by a judge for youth crimes reporting about the pointlessness of current criminological and legal sanctions against the very intense crime rates and brutality amongst Arab and Turkish juveniles (the judge meanwhile has commited suicide), the debate about former Federal Bank director Thilo Sarrazin's book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" where he fires a full broadside of official federal statistics illustrating that Muslim migratiuon causes Germany more problems than gains, and a general debate about the increasingly growing problem of mobbing, violence and discrimination against German students at public schools with sufficient numbers of Muslim/Araba/Turkish kids so that they can form dominating subgroups and gangs that terrorise German boys and girls and even teachers.

This debate has led to alarming signs of self-censorship that certain political and ideological groups demand in order to "solve" these problems by making it a collective obligation to ignore them and to beautify them. However, it seems a majpoirty of Germans i no longer buying it, having opposed and spoken out against politician's usual habit to nice-talk these porblems, inmstead giving immense support to Islam-critics and migration-critics. You also have to know that different to several other Wetsern nations, Germany alloed un discriminated migration, not selecting in advance what kind of specialists and educated people it could need, and what not. This led to most migrants coming to Germany not becasue they have educational specialisation to offer, but to participate in the enjoying of the benefits and sopcial caretaking of the German social system (statistics show this very clearly.) Sarrazin has won enomous popularity with his book (becoming the best sold non-fictional bestseller in Germany after the war!), and now politicians of the former conservative parties (that has moved massiovely away from conservatism in the Merkel-years in an attempt to win the left voters) see that people threaten to leave them standing alone in the rain. So they now try to gain back a stand in the shift of public opinion by first having chracater-assassinated Sarrazin, which did not work too well, and now leaving him alone and using his statements for their own causes. It is obvious that "multikulti" in Germany has failed with regard to Muslim parallel-societies that have formed up instead of integrating. Whether or not these new slogans by Merkel and Seehofer are something more than just lip-confessions born by mere opportunism, remains to be seen.

That the debate on Muslim migration alreadsy is mixed with a debate oin migration in general, is not helpful. Both groups do not compare, we have no problems with migration in general, only with that fromMuslim countries, namely Araba countries and - dominating - Turkey. Turkey on it'S behalf has understood that the winds are chnaging too. Just two years ago, EWrdoighan has publicly demanded in Cologne that Turks in Germany should stay Turkish and should reject integration, now all of a sudden he and Gül pick new words, saying that Turks should integrate, and now should learn German fluidly and without accent (what two years ago they had called a crime against humanity). They realise that they are in danger of loosing influence, since Germany jast has started at three universities to offer courses to educate and qualiufy German-raised Imams (so far they are being sent in by the Turkish ministry of religion and do not speak German in most cases, nor do they know the country, and Gewrman authorities do not control at all who it is that they are letting in).

That the debate on seeking asylum also is not kept separate from that on Muslim migration and lacking will to integrate in Germany, also is not helpful, nor is it that the political left and the islamophile appeasers once again try to gag the disucssion, and using the rethorical overkill weapon of accusing everybody critical of these things of right-winged extremism, Nazism and racism. What these people want is a German, pro-islamic Jacobin tyranny, regulating strictly what is a,llowed not only to say, but to think. The witch-hunting against Sarrazin has represented such an excess that so far is beyond any example in German history.

70-80% of Germans, so say polls from this year, are strictly against EU-membership of Turkey. One half up to two thirds consider Islam to be a threat and incompatible with the value system of the German constitution.

Europe-wide, there seem to have started a ciounter-movement against the leftistg opinion tyranny of welcoming Islam at all cost, no mmater how high. In several European countries, citizenS initiatives have formed up, forming a front against any more mosqeues and more Muslim migrants. Conservative small parties that are critical of Islam, also some right-.wionged poarties, have scored in national elections and now sit in parliaments. In Holland, meanwhile, the state attorney has skipped all chrages against Geert Wilders, which to rtaise was not his idea anyway, but a rule by a former court's judge who ordered the current trail, overruling a former setence to free Wilders of all the hilarious charges. If the current court follows the state attorney's demand, Wilders will be cleaned of all charges that mistake criticism of a religion with hate crime. On German radio, I heared some useful idiot from some pro-Islamic organisation in Holland already pointing out that freeing Wilders would violate the new EU laws that have been explcitly designed to protect Islam from any form of criticism and questions, and that one would then file a case on the crime of hate speech against Wilders directly at a European court. Actually, this Islamic activist is correct, any Dutch decision to end the Wilders case would villate EU laws indeed - which only shows how inane and totally brain-damaged these EU laws are.

Germany is no racist country, and it is no antri-migration country. A new advertisement over here reads : "our chancellor is female, our foreign minister is gay, our minister of health is Vietnamese". One could add one of our minister presidents is Scottish, and several Turks are holding high offices in the established parties, both on national level and on level of federal states.

I, and most of us, welcome migrants fro other countries - if they are willing to fully integrate instead of sticking to their own cults and habits, and if they have something to offer that our economy needs. We do not welcome people that are unedaucted, do not want to learn and do not want to integrate and instead want to stick with, if not even spread Islam. We need specialised talents. We do not need and can noit afford anymore even more loads of social wellfare-benefitters that represent the social low class even in their own coutnries, and that stay to be that in Germany - at the cost of the community. And that is what the statistics tell us, that is what what differs migrants from China, Japan, Korea, from migrants from Turkey, Albania, Afghanistan. Yes, there are some Turks hwho became successful businessmen and employers. But these example of success and integration and good will towards Germany, are not the rule amongst Turks - they are the rare exception. And that is what is part of the problem.