When do we really get to "soak the rich"?

[tater]

Originally Posted by August

You'll never get my vote.

Anyone against putting entitlements on the table is the problem. They will bankrupt us.

Phasing in a retirement age increase is the easy way to cut costs, and is 100% fair. It's not like the COnstitution demands that X% of everyone's life is to be leisure.

Anyone peeved by the use of "tough"... well, tough. I used it on purpose, because every time anyone mentioned "the third rail" all rational debate ends. The electorate indeed needs to grow a pair, and be tough.

But, hey, if you prefer insolvency or hyper-inflation, good luck with that. I'll be secure regardless of SS, myself, I'm only thinking of the rest of society. SOME safety net is better than a meltdown and NO safety net.