SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Special Projects > Subsim Events & Activities > 2010 Subsim Meet
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-10, 04:22 PM   #16
ivank
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,426
Downloads: 284
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427 View Post
Ivan and I saw the Liberty ship on our way back to CT, it was pretty impressive from the bridge.

EDIT: And I have to agree, for as decrepit a condition as the USS Salem was in, I really enjoyed how open it was.
Yes it was.
And the bridge was huge! 10 lanes!
Is this the one that messed with the GPS
__________________
Head of The Surface Warfare Super-Mod Team

Leutnant z. S. David U. Ziegler
U-105 IXB On Patrol 1

ivank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 05:25 PM   #17
Sledgehammer427
PacWagon
 
Sledgehammer427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
Default

rofl yup.
according to Ivan's GPS we were flying over water, then we were suddenly on the wrong side of the bridge...then we were okay...and going the wrong direction...
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer
Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168)
114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed
V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C!
Sledgehammer427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 05:42 PM   #18
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,220
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427 View Post
rofl yup.
according to Ivan's GPS we were flying over water, then we were suddenly on the wrong side of the bridge...then we were okay...and going the wrong direction...
Yeah a big bridge for the smallest state. Somebody was overcompensating for sure!
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 07:04 PM   #19
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
We had them. Someone told me that's what they were for. I don't know anything other than that.
I think he got it wrong. Most likely they were for chaff rockets.

Quote:
The only AA we had for sure was the dual-purpose part of the 5" guns - all four of them. One day during an excersize an A-7 came straight at us, maybe fifty feet above the water. By the time the guns could be brought to bear he had hopped up and over us. By the time they could be swung around the other way he had gone vertical and was out of range before the director could get a position lock.
Ouch, the new 5" guns are quite a bit better, they are fast enough to target subsonic ASMs.

Quote:
Absolutely useless in modern warfare. In every mock engagement we had, whether aircraft or submarine, we lost.
Don't feel so bad, not much has changed. My buddy served on a Arleigh Burke FLT IIA and he told me that against subs they are toast (the only time they found any was when the sub drivers were told to let them know where they were), and against missiles they are toast because the PRC has missile that home right in on their SPY-1D radar (he said one 'can drives around with its radar on to detect and guide missiles and soaks up the vampires while the others shoot using their data).
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 10:03 PM   #20
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Ouch, the new 5" guns are quite a bit better, they are fast enough to target subsonic ASMs.
The new guns do fire faster, but the real problem is fire control. We had the absolute very best WW2 technology.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 10:12 PM   #21
Sledgehammer427
PacWagon
 
Sledgehammer427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
We had the absolute very best WW2 technology.
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer
Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168)
114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed
V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C!
Sledgehammer427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-10, 10:35 PM   #22
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
The new guns do fire faster, but the real problem is fire control. We had the absolute very best WW2 technology.
So did the Dear Leader (or whatever it was named) when it sank the ROKS Cheonan.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-10, 12:20 AM   #23
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,220
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
The new guns do fire faster, but the real problem is fire control. We had the absolute very best WW2 technology.
Hey there is something to be said for having perfected technology. All the bugs are worked out!
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.