![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
My bad, now would like to know where I read that they had only shot down 1 plane (thought I might have gotten it mixed up with the u-flaks but they shot down at least 2 though), all this time had always thought that AA fire was a 100% futile effort, not just insanely dangerous (as if that wasn't enough).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 195
Downloads: 290
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
There is the Fight Back order of 1943. 26 boats lost vs 28 aircraft shot down. http://uboat.net/history/fight_back_order.htm
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
No, I meant exactly what I wrote. U-boat.net says that U-boats shot down 118 aircraft, and airplanes sank 249 u-boats. That's better than 2-to-1, or twice as many u-boats lost to aircraft as aircraft lost to u-boats.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
After desirableroasted pointed my error out I see that your ratio was right on the nose, sorry about mis-correcting you there. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Yeah. I remember one guy back when SH3 was new reporting being attacked by a swarm of Sunderlands. He said he shot down something like 52 before they finally got him.
For me historically is the only way to play, game or no. I have as much fun cruising out of the cool new harbors as I do actually sinking things.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 137
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Just a question from me. What if the weather is perfectly calm, no waves etc and the uboat is going deck's awash. Wouldn't it make it more stable as a shooting platform than if it would be fully surfaced? In real life I mean, I doubt it's possible in SH3.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
It MAY make it a little bit more stable but not enough to make a huge difference.
What it definitely would do though is slow the boat down and make it easier to hit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 137
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 795
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Something that really irked me about the stock game was the ridiculous aerial routines. For the first nearly four years of the war, Coastal Command suffered from a paucity of ASW capable aircraft, as Arthur "Bomber" Harris hoarded every large plane for his blindly zealous prosecution of the bombing campaign against Germany, hoping to prove that strategic bombing could win the war cheaply. Although he was a Brit, he was akin to Goering in his single mindedness that "Everything which flies belongs to me [Goering]." Similarly, Harris refused to release a relatively small number of four engined bombers, or even twin engined bombers which would have proved instrumental in protecting shipping from the U-boats. It wasn't even because the ASW weapons were not that efficient; even the presence of a plane would force a U-boat to dive and render it incapable of offensive action. Harris simply refused to allocate a suitable number of such planes for Coastal Command. If anyone should have been cashiered, it should have been him, not Stuffy Dowding of Fighter Command. To see whole squadrons of Hurricanes [d'uh, a fighter plane] or Sunderlands attack a single contact was so FUBAR. The relative scarcity of such patrol planes meant they had to be spread out in order to maximize the size of ocean they could colletively patrol. There was no way they could bring such a large number of planes together so quickly as we see them in the game. GWX has done a good job of restoring the depiction of aerial patrols to more reasonable levels. Historical is the only way to play for me. If I want an arcade game I'll get an Xbox.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
But...but...on my last patrol I sank twelve million trillion gazillion tons! Aren't you happy for me? Don't you want to join my new "Gazillion tons plus a thousand billion planes shot down" club?
[edit] I thought it was funny that when I played Sid Meiers Pirates! I turned the entire Spanish Main into the English Main. On level Three. On level Four I couldn't survive a week without my crew mutinying and marooning me on the proverbial desert island.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 795
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ha! I had that game but never played. In fact, I still have it. It came as part of a collection, "Best of Microprose" including Clash of Steel. In spite of the graphics of the time, those were the days! The gaming industry was able to introduce fresh ideas. Nowadays there is so much dreck on the market and serious simmers like us are crying out for a serious, realistic sim.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
SUBSIM Newsman
|
This aircraft cost me 15% hull, so it is 'risky' in most cases
![]()
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|