![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,983
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
Also, you cannot compare the sinking of a WWONE dreadnought/battleship to the sinking of a WWTWO battleship/battlecruiser, etc because the armor schemes, torpedo warheads, damage control techniques, all of it, was different in the two wars. If you're going to tell a story, tell the whole story or not at all.
__________________
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 48
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well the story is that large ships can be sunk with 1 torpedo whether ww1, ww2 or any other war. The lusitanias sinking was aided by open port holes, Tahio by poor damage control and similarly the Ark Royal. If the situation is right (or wrong if you are a sailor) then all ships can sink with semingly low damage. Britanic also sank under conditions it was meant to survive, a single mine or torpedo would not have been enough to founder the ship yet it did. Lusitania was built as a ship that could be converted to a armed cruiser, with money loaned from the goverment to cunard, so that in times of war the ships could be requisitioned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 76
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Wasn't the Shinano sunk with one torpedo, seventeen hours after being struck? I'm referring to the sister of the Yamato and Musashi that was converted to an aircraft carrier (in case I got the name wrong). Of course, she left port unfinished, with open holes in the watertight bulkheads where conduit was supposed to be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 76
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|