Why all the Obama hatred? - Page 5

SteamWake · 09-16-10, 09:57 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_579286.html

Ducimus · 09-16-10, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

Speaking of Anchor Babies

My dad worked in the Southwest as a CRNA for childbirth cases.

he worked there for about 18 months, and he says, on average... they delivered 300 of these anchor babies per month.

300

one town

on average

PER MONTH

The longer illegal immigration goes unchecked, the more we'll be voted out of our own country. I'm reminded of a movie quote from braveheart...

"If we can't get them out, we breed them out. That should fetch just the kind of lords we want to Scotland, taxes or no taxes."

Eventually, they'll have the majority vote in all of the south west, if not close to it already. Anchor babies, have a serious long term consequence.

Meanwhile.... the politicians (R or D ) do nothing because they're afraid they wont get re elected.

Aramike · 09-16-10, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus

The longer illegal immigration goes unchecked, the more we'll be voted out of our own country. I'm reminded of a movie quote from braveheart...

"If we can't get them out, we breed them out. That should fetch just the kind of lords we want to Scotland, taxes or no taxes."

Eventually, they'll have the majority vote in all of the south west, if not close to it already. Anchor babies, have a serious long term consequence.

Meanwhile.... the politicians (R or D ) do nothing because they're afraid they wont get re elected.

Oh man, how right you are.

As I've said before, before any serious discussion on illegal immigrants can occur, the border must be shut down. What really pisses me off is, what constituency is actually opposed to this?

None. There's just the fear that some people may not like it. Wow.

09-17-10, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Heh, had that experience myself a few days back actually

In what context?
oh no its that word you don't understand again, run and hide

Quote:

We do not want to let our tolerance of this vile belief system to the point where Europe, esp say the UK is.

Interesting, so what point is the UK especially at then bubble?

mookiemookie · 09-17-10, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tater

How did he get "anchor baby" wrong?

A baby born in the US is a citizen. They can therefore get government services. That's an anchor baby. Here in the SW, there are border school districts where the large majority of cost is educating kids born to illegals. Those kids qualifty for Salud (NM Medicaid), too. I hate that, since it reimburses below cost, but my wife is required to treat them (meaning literally that every such patient costs us money out of pocket (plus much larger opportunity costs).

Maybe they are not such a big deal in the NE. It's crushing in the SW.

Did I miss something else he implied other than that one sentence at the end of that post?

An "anchor baby" is not an anchor. If ICE decided to get off its ass and start deporting more illegal immigrant parents of babies born here in the U.S., there's nothing legally stopping them. An "anchor baby" is not insurance against deportation. It's a completely made up term.

Not sure why the hatred on this issue. The Obama admin is deporting record numbers of illegal immigrants. Oh, wait, yes I'm sure why - he's Obama. That's enough to cancel out reality and substitute it with someone's own.

MH · 09-17-10, 07:29 AM

So American peaple are jumping from extreme to extreme in their president choises.
Maybe they need a third party a middle ground not just D vs R because its not much of a choise.

GoldenRivet · 09-17-10, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH

So American peaple are jumping from extreme to extreme in their president choises.
Maybe they need a third party a middle ground not just D vs R because its not much of a choise.

you think?

August · 09-17-10, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH

So American peaple are jumping from extreme to extreme in their president choises.
Maybe they need a third party a middle ground not just D vs R because its not much of a choise.

The problem is that most of us tend to not like one of the letters more than the other and voting for a third party candidate with little chance of winning is almost the same as giving ones vote to the one we don't like.

GoldenRivet · 09-17-10, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

The problem is that most of us tend to not like one of the letters more than the other and voting for a third party candidate with little chance of winning is almost the same as giving ones vote to the one we don't like.

couldnt have said it better myself

MH · 09-17-10, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

you think?

No not really.
My guess is that next presdent after Obama will be more in overoll user friendly.
Thats how democracy usally work jump left then right then middle .Then somethig happens and all over again.

tater · 09-17-10, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

An "anchor baby" is not an anchor. If ICE decided to get off its ass and start deporting more illegal immigrant parents of babies born here in the U.S., there's nothing legally stopping them. An "anchor baby" is not insurance against deportation. It's a completely made up term.

So he's wrong because the common term—which tells you exactly what kids he's talking about with 2 words instead of "child of an illegal alien" at 5 words—is not literally true?

I know the term, and I know that they are not a free pass to citizenship for the parents, I know all that. I still used "anchor baby." That's the term. The left calls illegal aliens (the technical term for them) "immigrants" or "migrants" or "undocumented workers." We all know they are really talking about illegal aliens.

mookiemookie · 09-17-10, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH

No not really.
My guess is that next presdent after Obama will be more in overoll user friendly.
Thats how democracy usally work jump left then right then middle .Then somethig happens and all over again.

Eh, we might be in the new reality. The media has done very well selling hate and vitriol towards the last three presidents. I'm not sure they'll give up the cash cow.

GoldenRivet · 09-17-10, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Eh, we might be in the new reality. The media has done very well selling hate and vitriol towards the last three presidents. I'm not sure they'll give up the cash cow.

which media specifically.

The media seems to be equally as divided in praise and hate of the presidents as the populace.

krashkart · 09-17-10, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

which media specifically.

The media seems to be equally as divided in praise and hate of the presidents as the populace.

Who is being driven by who?

mookiemookie · 09-17-10, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

which media specifically.

The media seems to be equally as divided in praise and hate of the presidents as the populace.

All of it, pick an outlet and you'll find made up controversies that you wouldn't have seen 25, 30 years ago.

Quote:

Originally Posted by krashkart

Who is being driven by who?

Exactly.

09-16-10, 09:57 PM	#61
SteamWake Rear Admiral Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 13,224 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_579286.html __________________ Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648

09-17-10, 07:29 AM	#66
MH Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 3,184 Downloads: 248 Uploads: 0	So American peaple are jumping from extreme to extreme in their president choises. Maybe they need a third party a middle ground not just D vs R because its not much of a choise.