One Judge vs 7 million votes

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike

I have to disagree with you. I work for a lesbian couple and they just had their first child (a boy) last November thanks to IVI and are planing their second.

Why should they not receive the same protections as a Man+Woman+child group?

See what I said on adoptation, I am against it...

... also for psychological reasons and cultural reasons. While exceptions already exist were homosexual couples raise children one of the partner had from earlier marriage, it should remain to be an exception, last but not least in the interest of a child. As a psychologist (ex) I object to some study things being done that politically correct found what they were intended to find; that there is no difference for children'S future when they have hetero or homo parents. Earlier studies from the 70s and 80s showed something different: a statistically higher probabitly for them becoming depressive, and staying isolationistic. That has probably something to do with the social constellation at home (after all two women or two men are somethign different than one women and one man, becaseu the first two lack the social rolemodeol of a mother/a dad, and it would be nive,mif not incompertent to assume that this does not alter the social reality the child lives in, and effects it), but also with the fact that children of gay parents at school and in their social envrionment mjst be expected to be treated differently by the other children: that is how children are, they can behave cruel and not even knowing it.

If nature wanted two men or two women raising children, it would have given them the biological traits to produces children by themselves. Instead, nature has choosen to make us and mammals in general a species of two different sexes that differ physically as well as emotionally and psychologically; while making homosexuality (not rare amongst mamals) an exotic exception from the rule, but not the rule itself. In this statistical regard, homosexuality is not "normal" and not as of equal "quality" like heterosexuality. Let's bet who knows it better what is good for humans: political activists driven by ideology, or dear mother nature running a program of "best design survives longest, all others not as long". I put my money on the latter.