SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-10, 11:36 AM   #1
elanaiba
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,058
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robbo180265 View Post
For what it's worth - I agree too. His statement was completely out of line
While I appreciate the support, its just an opinion after all.

We're talking about something hypothetical after all, and in that hypothesis we can agree that if no-one from Ubi would be involved, there would be positives:
-a new team and creative vision can bring a different approach, different path, instead of going the same old routes
-possibility of having TWO subsims developed and competing against each other, instead of the current status quo - you like SH or not, its the only game in town.
__________________
With strength I burn...

elanaiba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 03:55 PM   #2
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Personally, i have the distinct impression submarine sim's are a generational thing. A small corner of a nitch market. The games industry isn't a public service, they're there to make big bucks. Walk into any store that still sells PC games, and it isn't hard to see what type of games move past the cash register.

There was a time when there were a few sub sims to choose from.... way back in the AOD, SH1 days, and the couple of "me too" clones they inspired. But the way things are now, ill wager that if no more submarine sims were ever made again, the only group (a small group in the big scheme of things) who would notice is the subsim.com community. The majority of game players and makers would not notice, nor would care.

In this respect, SH5 had the right idea to get a little (or alot) more RPGish. SH5 NEEDED to draw more people to the genre to draw interest to the genre in order to keep it alive. If it weren't released with so many bugs, an saddled with the DRM, it may have succeeded. But it didn't.

I for one, do not expect to see ANY more sub sim's for a VERY long time. Maybe even never again.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 02:54 AM   #3
JScones
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,501
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus View Post
There was a time when there were a few sub sims to choose from.... way back in the AOD, SH1 days, and the couple of "me too" clones they inspired. But the way things are now, ill wager that if no more submarine sims were ever made again, the only group (a small group in the big scheme of things) who would notice is the subsim.com community. The majority of game players and makers would not notice, nor would care.

<snip>

I for one, do not expect to see ANY more sub sim's for a VERY long time. Maybe even never again.
Here's where I think the future of "subsims" is...

http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/110/1103627p1.html
JScones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 02:50 AM   #4
JScones
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,501
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elanaiba View Post
We're talking about something hypothetical after all, and in that hypothesis we can agree that if no-one from Ubi would be involved, there would be positives:
-a new team and creative vision can bring a different approach, different path, instead of going the same old routes
-possibility of having TWO subsims developed and competing against each other, instead of the current status quo - you like SH or not, its the only game in town.
You know, whilst I agree 100%, I can't help but think that had anyone else made the same post, there'd be at least five "you're wrong" (and one "your wrong") posts made by now.

Just a random observation.
JScones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 02:54 AM   #5
robbo180265
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, England.Party capital of the south
Posts: 2,255
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JScones View Post
You know, whilst I agree 100%, I can't help but think that had anyone else made the same post, there'd be at least five "you're wrong" (and one "your wrong") posts made by now.

Just a random observation.
your wrong....
robbo180265 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 02:59 AM   #6
JScones
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,501
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robbo180265 View Post
your wrong....
JScones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 03:43 AM   #7
Tessa
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
Default

SH is nearly exactly like the X^ universe game series in terms of gameplay, mods and difficulty. If you're looking for instant gratification out of the box you'll be sorely dissapointed, but if you take the time to read the manuals and the forums (just the manual in both cases I think will still leave you really green and not get the full potential of the game) both games have nearly infinite possibilities.

The one aspect that I wish SH had that the X universe games have heavily benefitted from is having many of the game's actual programmers are also some of the biggest mod contributors to the game. Many of the mods for the games are unbelievable; though I would say that the quality and dedication of both SH and X^ communites is about equal, having programmers that are also hard core players and modders gives everyone an enormouse edge. Major bugs/physics problems are discovered by the people in the position to change them in future patches rather than have them propogate through each game like a few have with the SH series.

I can emphatize for the companies desire to have good DRM, but we're not talking about software that costs $200,000+ to license! Have faith in your customers, especially in this genre we're not talking about a bunch of irresponsible kids that are proud of how many cracked programs they have on their computer. Even if SH were shareware, I'd still pay the $20 because its worth it, and want to see newer better ones come out. As earlier pointed out SH5 was marketed to the wrong crowd which I think's 100% on the mark; not many people under 25 or 30 are going to have the interest in this series (of course any that do are always welcome with open arms, having the younger generation learn about what war was really like is outstanding) and spend the hours just learning how to play the game to the point that its enjoyable. Those of us that do aren't going to worry about DRM since we've go no reason not to buy a legit copy in the first place.
Tessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 02:56 AM   #8
Arclight
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
Default

Maybe. I'm not sure the team would decide to pursue his vision. I don't think having Dan on that team would exclude either of the 2 options.
__________________

Contritium praecedit superbia.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-10, 12:22 PM   #9
JU_88
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,803
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JScones View Post
You know, whilst I agree 100%, I can't help but think that had anyone else made the same post, there'd be at least five "you're wrong" (and one "your wrong") posts made by now.

Just a random observation.
About as 'random' as a 'random' airport security check on vagually middle-eastern looking guy.
JU_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.