Federal Judge blocks parts of the Arizona immigration law - Page 4

Jimbuna · 08-01-10, 08:34 AM

Didn't he pass himself off as an officer of the law?

August · 08-01-10, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

Didn't he pass himself off as an officer of the law?

Yeah, unsuccessfully I might add.

Jimbuna · 08-01-10, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

Yeah, unsuccessfully I might add.

LOL

ETR3(SS) · 08-01-10, 11:24 AM

More like an officer of the lol.

August · 08-01-10, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ETR3(SS)

More like an officer of the lol.

The Constable of Fail.

Jimbuna · 08-01-10, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ETR3(SS)

More like an officer of the lol.

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

The Constable of Fail.

Zachstar · 08-02-10, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

Didn't he pass himself off as an officer of the law?

That is what offended me the most. In my opinion he isnt an officer and it is HIGHLY offensive when you know officers who go out on the dangerous streets of Shreveport and just try to do their jobs and make the town a bit safer and help the community... Yet still have time and kindness to have a friendly conversation, joke around, and be part of the community.

When scum in my opinion impersonate officers on the net it helps build the fake meme that officers are "Against you" "Want a police state" or other stuff. It makes the jobs of the men and women of police departments that much harder and more dangerous.

There is room for civil discussion on the issue of immigration. Tho I am a progressive I am very PRO drone surveillance for instance. There is no room however for racists in the debate.

baggygreen · 08-02-10, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zachstar

Tho I am a progressive I am very PRO drone surveillance for instance. There is no room however for racists in the debate.

You might've mentioned before mate, but what's your stance on fencing the border a la israel?

In this instance there would be no issues with territory being contested for ownership..?

Zachstar · 08-02-10, 04:46 AM

I do not think it is possible to fence in properly such a large area. Funds just wouldn't hold and somehow they will find a way through it.

No we need more drones and tougher fines against companies that hire unlawful aliens.

mookiemookie · 08-02-10, 08:54 AM

If they're willing to brave a 2 day trek through a burning desert, I'm not sure how a fence would stop anyone. They'd just climb it or tunnel under it, like they're already doing: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012601963.html

It'd be wasted money.

SteamWake · 08-02-10, 02:44 PM

An esteemed learned spokesperson states her views...

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...x_concert.html

yubba · 08-02-10, 03:03 PM

In my humble opinion if a person comes into the country illegally, they are criminals and since they are not citizens, they have no rights , how ever

they do have the right to go back where they came from under their own power.

08-02-10, 03:29 PM

Sancturary cities are now banned under this ruling?

Wil the Obama Administration sue these cities in federal court for creating a hodgepodge of city laws?

08-02-10, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yubba

In my humble opinion if a person comes into the country illegally, they are criminals and since they are not citizens, they have no rights , how ever

they do have the right to go back where they came from under their own power.

Agreed. How long should we give them 14 days?

08-02-10, 04:35 PM

Quote:

In my humble opinion if a person comes into the country illegally, they are criminals and since they are not citizens, they have no rights

How can you match that opinion to US law?

08-01-10, 08:34 AM	#46
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 191,168 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	Didn't he pass himself off as an officer of the law? __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

08-01-10, 11:24 AM	#49
ETR3(SS) Ocean Warrior Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Between test depth and periscope depth Posts: 3,021 Downloads: 175 Uploads: 16	More like an officer of the lol. __________________ USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine.

08-02-10, 04:46 AM	#54
Zachstar Sea Lord Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Shreveport, Louisiana Posts: 1,956 Downloads: 13 Uploads: 0	I do not think it is possible to fence in properly such a large area. Funds just wouldn't hold and somehow they will find a way through it. No we need more drones and tougher fines against companies that hire unlawful aliens. __________________

08-02-10, 08:54 AM	#55
mookiemookie Navy Seal Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 9,404 Downloads: 105 Uploads: 1	If they're willing to brave a 2 day trek through a burning desert, I'm not sure how a fence would stop anyone. They'd just climb it or tunnel under it, like they're already doing: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012601963.html It'd be wasted money. __________________ They don’t think it be like it is, but it do. Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.

08-02-10, 02:44 PM	#56
SteamWake Rear Admiral Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 13,224 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	An esteemed learned spokesperson states her views... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...x_concert.html __________________ Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648

08-02-10, 03:03 PM	#57
yubba Admiral Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: in a neighborhood near you Posts: 2,478 Downloads: 293 Uploads: 2	In my opinion In my humble opinion if a person comes into the country illegally, they are criminals and since they are not citizens, they have no rights , how ever they do have the right to go back where they came from under their own power.

08-02-10, 03:29 PM	#58
The Third Man Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	Sancturary cities are now banned under this ruling? Wil the Obama Administration sue these cities in federal court for creating a hodgepodge of city laws?